What Temperature Gives a 25% Population Probability at 7.00 eV in Copper?

viviane363
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Pleas can you help me figure out what I do wrong?
At what temperature is the probability that an energy state at 7.00 eV will be populated equal to 25 percent for copper (EF = 6.95 eV)?

Homework Equations


The formula for the fermi-Dirac Distribution is f(E) = 1/(1+e^((E-EF)/kT))


The Attempt at a Solution


Looking at the problem I figured that f(E) = 25%=0.25 and E-EF=7.00 - 6.95 = 0.05eV
solving for T and found that T=3.2979e21 K, but it doesn't seem to be the right answer, why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmmm... That seems a bit much. What Boltzmann constant are you using? And double check your work, because I get a different answer than you.
 
That could well be the right answer (not sure of the exact answer, but you will get a big number). Metals have very high fermi temperatures - you can look at it in the following way. Fermi energy levels cannot be multiply-occupied. If that metal was made of bosons, it would have a temperature of 10^21 K because of where the highest energy electrons are.
 
That is way too large of a temperature. Hah, that is hotter than 1 second after the big bang. Also, the temperature of the Fermi energy is not even close to that. A Fermi energy of 6.95 eV has a Fermi temperature of 80,654 K.

viviane363 must have made a mistake somewhere in the calculation. Because I used the exact same formula and I got a completely different answer. But I think she forgot about this thread.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top