What will be stress in the unbalanced force situation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating stress in various scenarios involving unbalanced forces in physics. In Case 1, with a mass 'm' and a uniform cross-sectional area 'A', the stress is determined using the formula F/A, resulting in a stress of 99F/A due to the original force configuration. For Case 2, where the bar is massless, the stress remains equivalent to Case 1 under the assumption of negligible mass. In Case 3, where the force increases from 100F to 500F, the same methodology applies to find the stress, although specific calculations were not provided for these cases.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of stress and internal forces in physics
  • Familiarity with Newton's second law of motion
  • Knowledge of the formula for stress: F/A
  • Concept of unbalanced forces and their effects on acceleration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of massless objects in mechanics
  • Explore advanced concepts of stress distribution in materials
  • Learn about dynamic forces and their impact on stress calculations
  • Investigate the effects of varying force magnitudes on stress in structural analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, engineering, and materials science who are interested in understanding stress analysis under varying force conditions.

Ravi Singh choudhary
Messages
123
Reaction score
7
< Mentor Note -- thread moved to HH from the technical physics forums, so no HH Template is shown >[/color]

upload_2016-6-1_1-57-22.png

Problem Statement:
Case 1: Mass is m; Cross sectional area is uniform A. What will be the stress in the middle section.
Case 2: Bar is massless; What will be the stress in the middle section.
Case 3: Bar is still assumed massless but 100F is increased to 500F; What will be the stress in the middle section.

Relevant equation: F/A; point is to find internal force in each situation.

My attempt to the solution: I found the acceleration simply by dividing "m" to the net force "99F". My poor understanding about stress was; it only acts when body in is zero unbalanced force. Simply we have to find the internal force at point which stress need to be calculated. But I realized even after there is unbalanced force situation we have internal force at particular section.

So I solved for case I: a=(99F/m)
After solving equation F1-F=(m/2)*a; I found the value of F1 i.e. (101/2)F
stress will be F1/A.
upload_2016-6-1_2-10-23.png


But solution given was 99F/A i.e. stress due to original force configuration at middle section.

For Case 2 and Case 3; I am clueless.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about the forces acting on the individual wagons in a train which is being accelerated by the pull of an engine .
 
Ravi Singh choudhary said:
< Mentor Note -- thread moved to HH from the technical physics forums, so no HH Template is shown >

View attachment 101475
Problem Statement:
Case 1: Mass is m; Cross sectional area is uniform A. What will be the stress in the middle section.
Case 2: Bar is massless; What will be the stress in the middle section.
Case 3: Bar is still assumed massless but 100F is increased to 500F; What will be the stress in the middle section.

Relevant equation: F/A; point is to find internal force in each situation.

My attempt to the solution: I found the acceleration simply by dividing "m" to the net force "99F". My poor understanding about stress was; it only acts when body in is zero unbalanced force. Simply we have to find the internal force at point which stress need to be calculated. But I realized even after there is unbalanced force situation we have internal force at particular section.

So I solved for case I: a=(99F/m)
After solving equation F1-F=(m/2)*a; I found the value of F1 i.e. (101/2)F
stress will be F1/A.
View attachment 101476
I confirm this answer. Nicely done.
But solution given was 99F/A i.e. stress due to original force configuration at middle section.
In my judgment, this is not correct.
For Case 2 and Case 3; I am clueless.
In case 1, the mass of the bar is not specified. So, we can make the mass as small as we wish (of course, the acceleration will get higher and higher). However, in the limit of very small masses, the answer for case 2 will be the same as for case 1. In case 3, you apply the same methodology as for cases 1 and 2.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ravi Singh choudhary

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K