When Is the Potential Across a Capacitor Equal to That Across a Resistor?

Gabe805
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


.
Switch http://edugen.wileyplus.com/edugen/courses/crs7165/halliday9781118230725/c27/math/math152.gif in Fig. 27-63 is closed at time http://edugen.wileyplus.com/edugen/courses/crs7165/halliday9781118230725/c27/math/math164.gif, to begin charging an initially uncharged capacitor of capacitance 15 microfarads through a resistor of resistance 20 ohms. At what time is the potential across the capacitor equal to that across the resistor?
http://edugen.wileyplus.com/edugen/courses/crs7165/halliday9781118230725/c27/image_n/w1548-nn.png
Figure 27-63
Problems 57 and 96

Homework Equations


v=vmax(1-e^-(t/RC))
V=iR
i=imax(e^-(t/RC))[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


The answer winds up being .208 ms. so I am just looking for an answer. I want to know how to solve this. I tried using ohms law to figure out what the voltage is across R but of course that was a dead end because the emf is not given. next I tried iR=vmax(1-e^-t/RC). Again a dead end. Also I know that when the capacitor is fully charged the current is zero, hence the voltage across R will also be zero but I couldn't figure out how to implement that knowledge into a solution. Any help would be greatly appreciated.[/B]
 

Attachments

  • w1548-nn.png
    w1548-nn.png
    1 KB · Views: 466
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
None of the links to your figures are working.
 
I just uploaded another pic. In case that one doesn't work, the circuit is just an RC series circuit with a battery and a switch.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top