Where Am I Going Wrong in Calculating Free Energy of Heterogeneous Nucleation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the free energy of heterogeneous nucleation compared to homogeneous nucleation. The formula provided for total free energy includes terms for volume energy, surface area energy, and grain boundary energy, but there is confusion regarding the correct application for a spherical versus hemispherical nucleus. It is suggested that the formula used mixes characteristics of both types of nuclei, and a more accurate approach involves using the hemispherical model, which alters the volume and surface area calculations. Additionally, the relationship between the radii of maximum energy for heterogeneous and homogeneous nucleation is highlighted as a critical factor. Clarifying these points should help resolve the calculation discrepancies.
Dampi
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
My question is related to free energy of nucleation in heterogeneous systems and homogeneous systems.

I've been given to prove delta_G* (Hetero.)= 27/64 * (delta_G*(Homo))

The stuff I know is :
Total (delta G ) = [-4/3 *Pi*r^3* delta Gv] + [4*Pi*r^2*sigma] - [Pi*r^2 * sigma]

1st term is related to energy of volume destroyed in liquid during formation of spherical nucleus
2nd term is surface area created by the sphere which is a positive interfacial energy
3rd term is grain boundary area destroyed as the nucleus forms. (im not quite sure of this though)

so total delta G = delta hetero.

when i substitute r* =2*sigma/delta Gv

I get delta G* het= 1/4 *delta G* homo...

it'd be great if anyone can let me know where I'm going wrong!
Thanx!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
My immediate observation is that your formula for heterogeneous nucleation is partly for a spherical nucleus and partly for a hemispherical nucleus.

You can assume that the nucleus is fully coherent with the surface on which is forming. That is a fancy way of saying the lattices in the heterogeneous nucleus and surface match so there is no surface energy associated with that boundary.

If you rewrite your equation for a hemispherical heterogeneous nucleus, the volume is
2/3(pi)(r)^3

The surface area is
2(pi)(r)^2

The area (pi)(r)^2 is the circular area of the join between the hemispherical nucleus and the surface on which it forms. When there was previously liquid in contact with it, there was an associated energy of

(pi)(r)^2(sigma)
that has been replaced by a boundary with no surface energy associated with it.

Bear in mind that your radius of maximum energy will be different for homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation.
 
Hello! I've been brainstorming on how to prevent a lot of ferrofluid droplets that are in the same container. This is for an art idea that I have (I absolutely love it when science and art come together) where I want it to look like a murmuration of starlings. Here's a link of what they look like: How could I make this happen? The only way I can think of to achieve the desired effect is to have varying droplet sizes of ferrofluid suspended in a clear viscous liquid. Im hoping for the...
Hello everyone! I am curious to learn how laboratories handle in-house chip manufacturing using soft lithography for microfluidics research. In the lab where I worked, only the mask for lithography was made by an external company, whereas the mold and chip fabrication were carried out by us. The process of making PDMS chips required around 30 min–1 h of manual work between prepolymer casting, punching/cutting, and plasma bonding. However, the total time required to make them was around 4...
Back
Top