Where did pi^2 go in this QM j/eV unit conversion?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the energy difference between the ground state and the first excited state of an electron in a one-dimensional infinite potential well. The initial calculation yielded an energy difference of approximately 1.14 eV, which was expected to be around 0.115 eV, leading to confusion about unit conversions and the use of constants. It was noted that the incorrect mass of the electron used in calculations contributed to the discrepancy, as the problem stated a mass of 9*10^-30 kg instead of the accurate value. Additionally, suggestions were made to simplify calculations by using specific unit combinations to avoid conversion errors. Ultimately, the thread highlights the importance of using precise constants and units in quantum mechanics problems.
timn
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider an electron of mass m=9*10^-30 kg in an infinite box of dimension a=10^-9 m. What is the energy difference between the ground state and the first excited state? Express your answer in eV.

Homework Equations



E_n = \frac{\hbar^2\pi^2n^2}{2ma^2}

The Attempt at a Solution



E_2 - E_1 = 3E_1 = 3 \frac{\hbar^2\pi^2}{2ma^2}<br /> \approx \frac{ (1.054\times10^{-34} Js )^2 \pi^2 }{ 2(9\times 10^{-30} kg)(10^{-9} m)^2 } (6.24\times 10^{18} J/eV) \approx 1.14 eV<br />

The answer is supposed to be almost exactly 1/pi^2 of mine: 0.115 eV. Why? Am I being confused by a unit conversion?

Edit: I'm having a similar problem with the follow-up question: "Suppose the transition from the state n=2 to the state n=1 is accompanied by the emission of a photon, as given by the Bohr rule. What is its wavelength?"

<br /> \Delta E=h\frac{c}{\lambda} \Leftrightarrow \lambda = \frac{hc}{\Delta E} = \frac{2 \pi \hbar c}{\Delta E}<br /> \approx \frac{2\pi ( 6.6\times 10^{-16} eV s )( 3\times 10^8 m/s ) }{\Delta E}<br /> = \frac{2\pi ( 1.98 \times 10^{-7} eV m ) }{\Delta E}<br />

According to the key, the numerator in the latter is supposed to be 2pi*2.6*10^-7 eV m. What causes this factor?

\frac{2.6}{1.98}\approx\pi
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all why is the mass of the electron 9*10^{-30}... It's ~9.11*10^{-31} I'm going to assume you're using E-30 just as a rough approximation but that actually shocks me. I will use what you wrote in my calculations

You can simplify the energy formula to E = \frac{3h^{2}}{8ma^{2}}
Recall {\hbar} = \frac{h}{2{\pi}}
First to make things a little simpler. I noticed you didn't carry the 3 through in your post but I assume you used it in your calculation in the end.

Calculating that out I get:
E = \frac{3(6.626*10^{-34})^{2}}{8(9*10^{-30})(10^{-9})^{2}}
E = 1.829 * 10^{-20} J

Converting to eV I get:

E = 0.114eV

Is it possible you were using the value for h and not hbar when doing your calculation?
 
Your answers are correct. The answer key seems to have mistakes.

You can avoid some of the nuisance and confusion of unit conversions by sticking with units of electron-volts and nanometers and using the combinations
\begin{align*}
hc &= 1240~\mathrm{nm~eV} \\
\hbar c &= 197~\mathrm{nm~eV} \\
m_ec^2 &= 511~\mathrm{keV}
\end{align*}
where m_e is the mass of the electron. These combinations occur often enough that it's worth memorizing them.

You may need to slightly rewrite some expressions, though, by introducing factors of c. For example, for the energy levels, you'd do
E_n = \frac{\hbar^2 \pi^2 n^2}{2ma^2} = \frac{(\hbar c)^2 \pi^2 n^2}{2(mc^2)a^2} = \frac{(197~\mathrm{nm~eV})^2\pi^2 n^2}{2(511~\mathrm{keV})a^2}
You can see if a is in nanometers, the units conveniently reduce down to eV, which is what you wanted.
 
timn said:
Consider an electron of mass m=9*10^-30 kg in an infinite box of dimension a=10^-9 m. What is the energy difference between the ground state and the first excited state? Express your answer in eV.
Oh, I didn't notice the electron mass in the problem isn't the real electron mass. If it's not a simple typo, it's off by a factor of 10, which is why your answer and the key's answers are off by the same factor. Despite what you showed in your work, you apparently used the real electron mass in your calculation. It has nothing to do with factors of pi. It's just a coincidence that \pi^2 is almost equal to 10.
 
Sorry about missing the 3 and the electron mass -- it's supposed to say 0.9*10^-30. I'll look through your calculations and simplifications soon. Thank you very much for the input!
 
Thanks for your suggestions on the unit rearrangements, vela. I'll keep that in mind and see if it makes things easier.

The answers were found in a shady .doc file from scribd, and this would not be the first error. Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top