Where is the Electric Field Zero Between Two Charges?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the location along the x-axis where the electric field is zero between two charges: a positive charge Q1 at the origin and a negative charge Q2 positioned at x = +1.97 m. Participants explore the implications of the charges being of opposite signs and the conditions under which the electric field could be zero.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of the electric field between two charges and question whether a zero electric field can exist given their opposing signs. There are attempts to set up equations based on the electric field contributions from each charge and to analyze the positions where the fields might cancel.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the setup of equations and the interpretation of charge positions. There is an acknowledgment of errors in calculations and assumptions, with ongoing exploration of the correct approach to solving the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note confusion regarding the relative strengths of the charges and the implications for the electric field. There is mention of potential arithmetic errors in calculations, as well as the need to clarify the positions of the charges in relation to the zero field point.

mrbling
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Here is the question: A positive point charge Q1 = 3.00×10-5 C is fixed at the origin of coordinates, and a negative charge Q2 = -8.86×10-6 C is fixed to the x-axis at x = +1.97 m. Find the location of the place along the x-axis where the electric field due to these two charges is zero.

I am puzzled.. if both Q1 and Q2 are on the X axis, and they are of opposing signs, doesn't there ALWAYS exist an electric field, since the field will flow from the positive to the negative??

Can someone point out what I am missing? (b/c I am sure I'm missing something very obvious)

thnx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by mrbling
I am puzzled.. if both Q1 and Q2 are on the X axis, and they are of opposing signs, doesn't there ALWAYS exist an electric field, since the field will flow from the positive to the negative??
That's true between the two charges. So what does that tell you?
 
it is on the outside of these two charges..



X is to the left of Q2 since Q1 is much stronger than Q2 and they are of opposite charges.. thus the picture would look like:
Q1---Q2----X

I set up Etotal=E1 + E2 = 0
thus kQ1/R1^2 = kQ2/R2^2, cancelling out K..
if Q1=3x10^-5 C and is at X=0 thus R1 (relative to x) is X+1.97 and
Q2=-8.86x10^-6 and is at X=1.97 thus R2 is X

thus my equation is: (3x10^-5)/(X+1.97)^2 = (-8.86x10^-6)/(X)^2
Solving for X, I get .18819, which would place X at 1.97+.18819=2.16m.

But this is wrong.. can someone give me a hint to where I went wrong? This question is killing me..
 
Your analysis is correct. You have an error in solving the equation.
 
Originally posted by mrbling
... thus the picture would look like:
Q1---Q2----X
...
... But this is wrong.. can someone give me a hint to where I went wrong?
You mixed up Q1 and Q2 in your equations. According to your picture, Q2 must be the smaller charge.
 
[?]

You mixed up Q1 and Q2 in your equations. According to your picture, Q2 must be the smaller charge.

Q2 is the smaller charge. I think he just got confused when he wrote "left", since he drew it with position "x" correctly on the right. The way he set up the equation is consistent with the drawing and does give the correct result. He simply made some arithmetical error in solving it.
 
I figured it out. I probably spent 4 hours doing this problem (and every variation of solving it under the sun) before I figured out I was taking the Square instead of the square root!

thanks for all of your help!
 
Originally posted by gnome
Q2 is the smaller charge. I think he just got confused when he wrote "left", since he drew it with position "x" correctly on the right. The way he set up the equation is consistent with the drawing and does give the correct result. He simply made some arithmetical error in solving it.
You are absolutely right! (I wasn't paying attention to the exponents. ) Thanks for the correction.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
983
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
972
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K