Which Is the Best Leaving Group: Cl-, Enolate, or NR3?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on evaluating the best leaving group among Cl-, enolate, and NR3. Participants agree that Cl- is likely the best leaving group due to its association with a stronger acid (HCl) compared to NR3. The resonance stabilization of the enolate is noted, but it is suggested that Cl- is superior because it forms a weak conjugate base. The consensus leans towards Cl- being the most effective leaving group in this context. Overall, Cl- is favored for its stronger acid-base relationship.
destinc
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
which is the best leaving group?
Cl- enolate NR3


I couldn't figure out how to draw the enolate here, but it is a basic 3 carbon one.
I believe the answer is Cl because resonance on the enolate will disperse the neg. charge. Am I on the right track or is there a factor I am missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
destinc said:
which is the best leaving group?
Cl- enolate NR3


I couldn't figure out how to draw the enolate here, but it is a basic 3 carbon one.
I believe the answer is Cl because resonance on the enolate will disperse the neg. charge. Am I on the right track or is there a factor I am missing?

strong acid=> weak conjugate base(it is leaving group)=>good leaving group.
I don't know enolate looks like but out of other two Cl is best since it's acid(HCl) is stronger acid than that of NR3(that's NR3H)
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top