Which Metal Sample Shows Greater Uncertainty in Specific Heat Calculation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining which metal sample, A or B, exhibits greater uncertainty in specific heat calculations based on given experimental data. Both samples have the same mass and initial conditions, but differ in their thermal equilibrium temperatures. The calculations show that Metal A has a specific heat uncertainty of 5 +/- 0.19716 KgK°C, while Metal B has a higher uncertainty of 6.5 +/- 0.29705 KgK°C. The conversation highlights that the larger temperature change in Metal B may lead to a smaller relative error, suggesting that the uncertainty is influenced by the temperature difference. The problem emphasizes the importance of error propagation in experimental physics, particularly in algebra-based contexts.
tucky
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
specific heat?

Hey guys….I need help with another problem.

Q: Below are two sets of data from an experiment to determine the specific heat of a metal sample. For which mass will t the uncertainty n the specific heat be greater? Explain your answer. The uncertainty in all temperature measurements is +/- 1 degree C. And for all masses are +/- .1g. The specific heat of water is 1.0 cal/g degree C with negligible uncertainty.

Metal Sample A:
Initial temperature A----25 C
Mass of metal A-------- 100g
Initial Temp of water----100 C
Mass of water-----200g
Thermal Equilibrium temp of metal B in water---75 C

Metal Sample B:
Initial temp B----25C
Mass of metal----100g
Initial temp of water----100C
Mass of water----200g
Thermal Equilibrium temp of metal B in water---90C

A: Q=m*C*(change temp)

Metal A Q=(.1 +/-.0001kg)C(348+/-1K-298+/-1k)
Metal A Q=5+/-.19716KgKC

Metal B Q=(.1 +/-.0001kg)C(363+/-1K-298+/-1k)
Metal B Q=6.5+/-.29705KgKC


Now, I am stuck…I don’t know how to finish this problem. Can anyone help me? Actually, I don’t even know if I am on the right track.

Tucky
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think this is an exercise in error propagation.
If you have a function
<br /> f = f(x, y, z),<br />
then the uncertainty is
<br /> df = \sqrt{ (\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}dx)^2 + (\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}dy)^2 + (\frac{\partial f}{\partial z}dz)^2}.<br />
 
Is there a way to do work this problem without calculus? Because my class is an algebra/trig based class. Thank you for your help.
 
Well, in the 2 experiments all data are the same, except for the final temperature. So you could argue that the larger change in temperature corresponds to the smaller relative error.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top