Which of the following strong reactions is possible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter katamaster818
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying possible strong reactions from proton-proton collisions based on baryon number conservation. Reactions a, c, and d are deemed possible, while reaction b is not due to baryon number violation. Participants express confusion about baryon numbers, mesons, and the conservation laws governing particle interactions. Clarifications are provided regarding the definitions of baryons and mesons, emphasizing that baryons have a baryon number of 1 and mesons have a baryon number of 0. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding various conservation laws in particle physics, including baryon number and lepton conservation.
katamaster818
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Which of the following strong reactions (from a collision) is possible?

a. p + p --> p + n + K+
b. p + p --> Λ0 + K0 + p + π+
c. p + p --> p + p + π+ + π-
d. p + p --> p + n + π+

Homework Equations



Conservation of the Baryon Number (http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Particles/Parint.html#c2)

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
(replaced the original symbols with what I think is the correct baryon number for each particle?)
a. 1 + 1 --> 1 + 1 + 0 (Possible)
b. 1 + 1 --> 0 + 0 +1 + 0 (Not possible)
c. 1 + 1 --> 1 + 1 + 0 + 0 (possible)
d. 1 + 1 --> 1 + 1 + 0 (Possible)

My solution: A, C, and D are possible.

I'm confused with identifying the baryon numbers, I'm pretty sure I'm doing it incorrectly. I'm also confused when a particle has a negative baryon particle vs a positive one, and I'm also confused on how to identify baryons vs masons. I'm only taking AP Physics in high school, none of this stuff is in my textbook (which isn't even an AP textbook in the first place), and my teacher decided to make up this curriculum on her own :/

I should also mention that I got this problem from a list of practice problems that the teacher gave us for our modern physics test tomorrow. You'll definitely be seeing the bubble chamber soon on here as well :/
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Check the baryon number of a ##\Lambda##.

Baryon number is not the only conserved quantity in the strong interaction.
katamaster818 said:
and I'm also confused on how to identify baryons vs masons
Mesons, not masons. Mesons have a quark and an antiquark and baryon number 0. Baryons have three quarks and baryon number 1. Antibaryons have three antiquarks and baryon number -1.
You have to know or look up what the individual symbols (##\pi, \Lambda##, ...) mean, those Greek letters don't follow any pattern.

Baryon number is basically (quarks-antiquarks)/3.
 
mfb said:
Check the baryon number of a ##\Lambda##.

Baryon number is not the only conserved quantity in the strong interaction.
Mesons, not masons. Mesons have a quark and an antiquark and baryon number 0. Baryons have three quarks and baryon number 1. Antibaryons have three antiquarks and baryon number -1.
You have to know or look up what the individual symbols (##\pi, \Lambda##, ...) mean, those Greek letters don't follow any pattern.

Baryon number is basically (quarks-antiquarks)/3.

Ok, so I see that my baryon number for lambda was incorrect, and that it should be 1. Does that mean all four of these are viable strong reactions? Or am I using the wrong equation for this problem? I think there is supposed to be only one correct answer, my teacher usually will let us know in the question if more than answers can be correct.

Does this problem have to do with conservation of leptons? Your comment led me to searching for other laws of conservation that apply to particle collisions, and I stumbled across this. I'm reading up on what a lepton is now.

And thank you, that cleared up my confusion regarding the calculation of Baryon numbers for particles. I like to know the way things are calculated so I have a deeper understanding of the topic.
 
Last edited:
katamaster818 said:
Ok, so I see that my baryon number for lambda was incorrect, and that it should be 1. Does that mean all four of these are viable strong reactions?
No, it just tells you baryon number is not violated for any of them.
katamaster818 said:
Does this problem have to do with conservation of leptons? Your comment led me to searching for other laws of conservation that apply to particle collisions, and I stumbled across this. I'm reading up on what a lepton is now.
Do you see leptons in the reactions?

There is something else that is conserved, and that makes one reaction impossible.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top