I Which ψ do I use for the Expectation Value ?

SpaceNerdz
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
I have to calculate the Expectation Value of an Energy Eigenstate : < En >
The integral is ∫ ψ* En ψ dx

I have :
A ) ψ = √L/2 sin nπx/L , a single standing wave of the wave function
B ) ψ = BsinBcosD , the wave function of the particle
C ) ψ = ΣCn ψn = C , sum of all the standing waves

Which ψ do I use ? Why ? What's wrong with using the other two ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SpaceNerdz said:
Which ψ do I use ?

The short answer is, whichever one corresponds to the energy eigenstate you are trying to calculate the expectation value of. But first you need to explain where you are getting these three functions from. What is the physical situation you are asking about? An electron in an atom? A free particle? What?
 
In other words, wave function is contextual.
 
SpaceNerdz said:
I have to calculate the Expectation Value of an Energy Eigenstate : < En >
That's not the correct terminology. There is no expectation value "of a state" but only an expectation value of a physical quantity (like energy, position, momentum, spin).

If you calculate the expectation value of energy, you know what to expect in the lab if you repeat the same measurement many times and average over the outcomes. What do I mean with "the same" in this sentence? You need to measure the same physical quantity (energy in this case) and you need to make sure that the system is in the same state \psi for all measurements. So of course, the expectation value of a physical quantity depends on which state \psi your system is in.

The expectation value of energy is often denoted as \langle H \rangle_{\psi} where H stands for the energy operator. Your notation \langle E_n \rangle doesn't make sense, because it specifies only the state (which is E_n) but not the physical quantity of which you want to calculate the expectation value. You may say that it is obvious that you want to calculate the expectation value of energy but we could as well calculate the expectation value of position for your state E_n, which would read like this: \langle X \rangle_{E_n}.

SpaceNerdz said:
The integral is ∫ ψ* En ψ dx
This formula is only correct if ψ is an energy eigenstate. Where does the formula come from? Has it been derived? Please give context and state your knowledge level.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top