Why are arch bridges stronger than beam ones?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jadoreparis30
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Bridges
AI Thread Summary
Arch bridges are stronger than beam bridges because their design allows for the distribution of weight along the curve, effectively transferring loads to the supports. This shape minimizes tension and maximizes compression, making arches more efficient in supporting weight. Pasta, like many materials, is typically stronger in compression than in tension, which aligns with the arch design's advantages. The amount of pasta used in an arch structure is generally more than in a flat beam, contributing to its strength. Understanding these principles can enhance the design and performance of a pasta bridge in a physics project.
jadoreparis30
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
When building a pasta bridge, why are arches or triangular peaks able to support more weight than flat beam bridges? Assume the weight would be attached to the base/deck of the bridge.

I'm building a pasta bridge for my Physics class and I was curious. Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is pasta stonger in compression or tension?

Also, is there more pasta in an arch/peak or a flat beam?
 
I believe pasta would be stronger in tension, but weak in compression.
 
Oh, one more thing to think about: if you take a flat noodle (e.g. linguini) is it stronger with "edge" vertical or the "flat"?

PS, I am not 100% sure about pasta, but most brittle materials are weak in tension and strong in compression
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Best truss bridge design for this school project?
Replies
5
Views
4K
Why Are Triangles the Optimal Shape for Bridge Design Over Arches?
Replies
6
Views
6K
Which design is better for a popsicle stick bridge: left or right?
Replies
2
Views
6K
Changing capacitance effect on ripple in full rectification circuit
Replies
4
Views
3K
Bridge design conceptual questions
Replies
5
Views
2K
Arches or Beams: Why Arches Hold More Weight on Pasta Bridges
Replies
2
Views
2K
Build Paper Bridge: Guidelines & Suggestions
Replies
4
Views
28K
Beam calculation with 3 unknowns
Replies
5
Views
3K
How Does the Arch Design Enhance the Strength of My Spaghetti Bridge?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Extreme Confusion of centripetal acceleration force and normal force
Replies
1
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top