Why are electric field lines also referred to as "lines of force"?

AI Thread Summary
Electric field lines are referred to as "lines of force" because they represent the direction and strength of the force experienced by a charged object in an electric field. Equipotential lines are contours where the electric potential is constant, and they are always perpendicular to electric field lines. This perpendicular relationship exists because no work is done when moving a charge along an equipotential line, as the electric field does not exert a force in that direction. The electric field vector points away from positive charges and towards negative charges, indicating the direction of the force on a positive test charge. Understanding these concepts is crucial for analyzing electric fields and potential energy in physics.
TypeFun
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Why are electric field lines also referred to as "lines of force"?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Equipotential Lines

Homework Statement


What are equipotential lines?
What is their relationship to electric fields lines?
Directions of electric fields are indicated by arrows, why are no directions indicated on equipotential lines?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Two similar question threads merged.

On the Field/Force question, can you please show us the equation for the force on a charged object that is in an Electric field?

And on the Equipotential lines question, which way does the Electric field vector point, in relation to the Equipotential lines? Why do you think it points that way? Think about the force on the charged object question above...
 
E=F/q

By convention, the electric field vector points towards the negative and away from the positive. As far as I understand it, the decision for why an electric field vector points a certain way is a decision made by the person drawing the diagram

"Think about the force on the charged object question above..."
Are you referring to the equation that you asked for? In that case, the force is proportional to the electric field. Beyond that, I'm unsure how that relates to the direction of the equipotential lines.
 
TypeFun said:
E=F/q

By convention, the electric field vector points towards the negative and away from the positive. As far as I understand it, the decision for why an electric field vector points a certain way is a decision made by the person drawing the diagram

"Think about the force on the charged object question above..."
Are you referring to the equation that you asked for? In that case, the force is proportional to the electric field. Beyond that, I'm unsure how that relates to the direction of the equipotential lines.

You wrote the correct equation, with the only thing to be added being that both F and E are vectors. So they point in the same direction.

Since forces do work, and since the force points in the same direction as E (for a positive charge in that E), the electric field E does no work on the test charge as it is moved orthogonally to the direction that the E field points in. Does that make sense? Work is force times distance (or Force vector dotted onto the path of movement), so if the movement is orthogonal to the Force vector, no work is done, and potential energy PE due to the E field is not changed.

So why are the equipotential lines always at right angles to the E field vector?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top