Why are reference angles necessary in trig

AI Thread Summary
Reference angles in trigonometry are essential for simplifying calculations by providing the acute angle corresponding to any given angle. They are defined as the difference between the angle and the nearest multiple of 180° (π), ensuring they always fall between 0° and 90°. Trigonometric tables traditionally only include values for angles up to 90°, making reference angles a practical tool for finding sine, cosine, and tangent values for larger angles. This method was particularly useful before calculators, as it allowed for easier lookup and calculation. Overall, while not strictly necessary, reference angles greatly enhance convenience in trigonometric computations.
Luke77
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Why are reference angles necessary in trigonometry. I understand they are the acute version of an obtuse angle.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Luke77! :smile:
Luke77 said:
Why are reference angles necessary in trigonometry.

I've never come across them before. :confused:

Apparently, they're the difference between the angle and the nearest multiple of 180° (π).

(so they're always between 0° and 90°)

In other words, trig tables only give you measurements up to 90°, so you find the "reference angle", look up the trig of that in the trig table, and if necessary multiply by minus-one. :smile:

(see http://www.mathwarehouse.com/trigonometry/reference-angle/finding-reference-angle.php for some examples)
 
Reference angles aren't "necessary". They are convenient, especially back in the years 'BC' (Before Calculators) when you had to look up trig functions in tables. Rather than have tables that extended to, say, 135 degrees, 225 degrees, and 315 degrees, they just went from 0 to 90 degrees so you could look up the "reference angle", 45 degrees, for all those and then apply the correct sign yourself.
 
Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top