Why Are There Different Reference Potentials in Electric Potential Formulas?

AI Thread Summary
Different reference potentials in electric potential formulas can create confusion due to their arbitrary nature. The zero point of potential is not fixed and can be set like the origin in a coordinate system, meaning potential values are relative to this chosen zero. The equations presented illustrate various contexts: the definition of potential difference, a differential form, and the potential from a point charge. Each equation serves a specific purpose, with the third representing the electric potential at a distance from a charge rather than a potential difference. Understanding these distinctions clarifies how potential energy changes are measured in different scenarios.
brentd49
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
There seems to be two different uses of potential difference that either contradict each other, or at the very least make it very confusing. Let me write the three different forms:

Definition: Vf-Vi= -E*d
Differential: dV=-E*dr (Vi=0)
Point Charge: V=E*r (Vf=0)

What is with the different reference potentials (Vi,Vf=0)? Can someone please make sense out of this.

Edit: I avoided writing integrals above because I don't how to use latex, and the book I'm studying is Halliday, Resnik.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is a nice discussion of potential energy. It is really the change in potential energy that matters.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/pegrav.html#pe

Gravitational potential energy - http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/gpot.html#mgh

Electric potential energy - http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elepe.html#c1

Reference potential - potentials are relative!

The nature of potential is that the zero point is arbitrary; it can be set like the origin of a coordinate system. That is not to say that it is insignificant; once the zero of potential is set, then every value of potential is measured with respect to that zero.
ref Hyperphysics

Read also the third plate in the link on electric potential - Potential Reference at Infinity.
 
brentd49 said:
There seems to be two different uses of potential difference that either contradict each other, or at the very least make it very confusing. Let me write the three different forms:

Definition: Vf-Vi= -E*d
Differential: dV=-E*dr (Vi=0)
Point Charge: V=E*r (Vf=0)

What is with the different reference potentials (Vi,Vf=0)? Can someone please make sense out of this.

Ok, so you Vf & Vi are values of potential. So if you substract them, you get the difference in potential between them.

Your second is just substituting 0 into your first equation.

Your third equation is not potential difference. It is a value of electric potential at a distance r from a point charge (It is the energy required to bring a unit charge of identical polarity from infinity to the distance r from the point source; that's the way I think about it).

Does this help you?

Regards,
Sam
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top