Why Do We Add Mc and Mf in Calculating Resultant Couples?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the dimension "a" to achieve a resultant couple of 480 N-m from two force couples. The confusion arises from understanding the addition of moments Mc and Mf in the solution, particularly in relation to the forces at points C and F. It is clarified that Mc and Mf are included to account for the moments induced by the forces about point C, ensuring the total moment is accurately represented. The geometry of the rollers complicates the resolution of forces, especially for diagonal forces, necessitating their decomposition into components. Overall, the solution emphasizes the importance of resolving forces correctly to find the unknown dimension "a."
Mikejax
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Moments and force couples...confused!

Homework Statement


I have attached 2 pdfs: 1 is the problem, the second is the solution. I need help understanding the solution. Diagrams included.

The gist of the problem:
Need to calculate a dimension "a" such that a resultant couple (from 2 force couples) will equal 480 N-m. I understand how they reduce couple AD, but not how they reduce couple CF. They reduce couple cf in their expression Mc + Mf + forcecouple C and F about C.

I understand why they take C and F about C, but why are Mc and Mf added on top this? I am trying to follow the following principle: The moment induced by 2 equal and opposite forces is equal to the moment of the one force about the point of application of the other".

I don't get how adding Mc and Mf on top this works. (I am referring to the first line of math under the diagram of the solution).

I am so confused, it would be so amazing if someone here could clarify this for me.

Homework Equations

M = M1 + M2

The Attempt at a Solution



see above.

Homework Statement


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org


The solution relies on the fact that the geometry of the rollers is such that not only are the horizontally applied forces paired, but they have paired the diagonal forces since they are parallel as well. For instance you can draw the connecting line through D, by moving it out along the parallel lines of action to D. The first term as you note is the resolution of the AD horizontal forces, and the second is the resolution of the diagonal forces that are spaced by the geometry of the common connector that is ⊥ between the two ... 2a√ 2

In the second part you can no longer use the geometry implied by the a = 8, meaning that you cannot couple the 2 diagonal forces so simply. So you need to resolve the diagonal forces into their components, because the dimension a is unknown and since the desired moment isn't the answer from a) is definitely not a = 8.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top