Why Does Hooke's Law Seem Contradictory in Calculating Spring Energy?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the apparent contradiction between Hooke's Law, F=mg=kx, and the energy calculation, mg=(1/2)x*k. The confusion arises from the assumption that energy can be calculated using a constant force, which is not valid in this context. It is emphasized that the energy formula, E=force x displacement, only applies when the force remains constant throughout the displacement. The conversation suggests that understanding differential calculus may clarify the relationship between force and energy in spring systems. Proper measurement of the spring's displacement is crucial for accurate energy calculations.
tallwallyb
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Given a vertical spring with spring constant k=53N/m, a 2.5kg weight is hung from it. What is the change in x of the weight. (USE HOOKE'S LAW and compare it to using ENERGY.
Relevant Equations
F = kx
PEs = (1/2)kx^2
PEg = (mgh)
On the energy part, I keep getting mg=(1/2)*x*k, which is contradictory to Hooke's law F=mg=kx. What is going on?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please show how you applied energy considerations. Suppose you were given the spring and mass and you wanted to measure "the change in x of the weight." What procedure will you follow to do that? That procedure is important because it will inform your use of energy considerations.
 
tallwallyb said:
On the energy part, I keep getting mg=(1/2)*x*k, which is contradictory to Hooke's law F=mg=kx. What is going on?
I'm guessing you divided E by x expecting to get F. But the equation energy = force x displacement only works if the force is constant.
Are you familiar with differential calculus?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
View full post »

Similar threads

Spring with mass hangs from the ceiling
Replies
22
Views
1K
Calculating the spring force constant K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Problem with when to use Force and Energy. What compresses spring/
Replies
3
Views
1K
Spring Problem Involving Variables and Constants Only
Replies
3
Views
1K
A block dropping onto a spring system
2
Replies
58
Views
2K
Vertical spring & maximum length
Replies
6
Views
963
Initial velocity of bird landing on horizontal wire modeled as spring
Replies
7
Views
907
Spring constant formlula for Force and Work Done
Replies
12
Views
2K
Difficulty in deciding when to apply work energy theorem
Replies
2
Views
1K
Time period of SHM & Energy conservation in pulley-spring-block system
Replies
24
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top