Why Does My Calculation of Gravitational Force Keep Showing as Incorrect?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the net gravitational force on a mass at the origin due to two other identical masses positioned along the x-axis. The user initially calculated the forces from each mass but incorrectly applied the formula by subtracting instead of adding the magnitudes, leading to an incorrect final answer. It was clarified that the net force should consider the direction of the forces, resulting in a negative value. Additionally, the importance of significant figures was highlighted, as the final answer should be expressed to three significant figures. The correct net gravitational force was ultimately determined to be -0.00151 N.
saugei
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Three identical masses of 650 kg each are placed on the x-axis. One mass is at -13.0 cm, one is at the origin, and one is at 42.0 cm. What is the magnitude of the net gravitational force on the mass at the origin, due to the other two masses?

I solved this problem in the homeowrk section of the textbook and got the answer right. This is the same problem, but with different numbers. Somehow when I enter the answer in the computer it keeps on saying that I'm wrong. Please look at my work and see what went wrong. Heres my work:

I used the formula: F_g = (Gm_1m_2)/R^2 where G= 6.67 x 10^-11

The gravitational force from the mass at -.13 m on the mass at the origin is calculated to be: -.001668

The gravitational force from the mass at .42 m on the mass at the origin is calculated to be: .00016

Net gravitational force is: |F_g1 - F_g2| = .001508 N

This answer was wrong. Thanks to anyone that is gracious enough to spend time on this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well, you're adding to get your answer, while your equation is showing the difference of the two forces.

i would think that the sum would be correct, though.
 
The sum is not correct, I tried it. The two forces are pulling in opposite directions, so I think subtracting is much more appropriate to get the "net force" on the mass at the origin.
 
Does the computer care about sig figs? Because you're only given the mass to two sig figs, whereas you're representing your answer to 4.

--J
 
Teclo and Justin both of you were right! Thanks. The net force would be to the left hence negative and its to 3 sig figs. So the answer was -.00151 compared to my original: +0.001508. Thanks
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top