Why Does the Charge of a Lead Nucleus Affect Electric Field Calculation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the electric field generated by a lead nucleus with 82 protons. The correct formula for the electric field at a distance of 1.0x10^-10 m is E = K * (82 * 1.6x10^-19) / (1.0x10^-10)^2, where K is Coulomb's constant. The confusion arises from the misunderstanding that the charge of each proton should be raised to the power of 82, rather than multiplying the charge of a single proton by the number of protons. Each proton contributes equally to the total charge, which is why the total charge is 82 times the charge of one proton. This clarification emphasizes that the total charge is additive rather than exponential in this context.
mimictt
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The nucleus of a lead atom has a charge of 82 protons
a. what are the direction and magnitude of the electric field at 1.0x10^-10 m from the nucleus?

Homework Equations


E=Kq/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I did E= ((9 x10^9)(1.6X10^-19)^82)/ (1.0x10^-10)^2

but when I checked cramster.com for the answer, it gave me E= ((9 x10^9) (82) (1.6X10^-19))/ (1.0x10^-10)^2

can someone explain to me why it's 82 times (1.6X10^-19) not (1.6X10^-19)^82??

thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Each proton has a charge of 1.6E-19 coulombs, so 82 of them have a charge of 82*1.6E-19 coulombs. Why do you think it should be (1.6E-19)^82?
 
phyzguy said:
Each proton has a charge of 1.6E-19 coulombs, so 82 of them have a charge of 82*1.6E-19 coulombs. Why do you think it should be (1.6E-19)^82?

well because I thought that if you have to calculate the force of two protons/electrons then you would have to multiply Q1 x Q2 and since they both have the same charge---> Q^2

this is how i got (1.6E-19)^82 because i thought that there are 82 protons with the same charge...
 
No! you multiply the total charges in the two bodies.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top