Why does the finite square well problem require numerical solutions?

MGWorden
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Introduction to Quantum Mech Griffiths 4.9for the problem of a finite square well

v(r) =

{-Vo r<= a (i will call section I)

0 r>a (section II)

Homework Equations



After I find uI and uII

uI = A sin(K r)
uII = De^-kr

and then set the boundary condition

uI = uII at a equation 1
uI' = uII' at a equation 2

next i know I divide equation 2 by equation 1

The Attempt at a Solution

then i set Kr = z and

zo = sqrt(2mVo) a / h

and then i graph it with cot(z) and sqrt[(zo/z)^2-1] and look for the intersections.

But I don't know why I do this, or what the graph means.

It tells me something about the bound states but I don't know what or why.

My teacher said it is used to solve the problem numerically, but why does it need to be solved numerically?

So any information on what this step in the solving process is for would be great
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MGWorden said:

Homework Statement



Introduction to Quantum Mech Griffiths 4.9


for the problem of a finite square well

v(r) =

{-Vo r<= a (i will call section I)

0 r>a (section II)


Homework Equations



After I find uI and uII

uI = A sin(K r)
uII = De^-kr

and then set the boundary condition

uI = uII at a equation 1
uI' = uII' at a equation 2

next i know I divide equation 2 by equation 1
What's the equation you finally end up with? It would help us to see that and also any equations relating k and K to the energy of the state and the depth of the well.

The Attempt at a Solution




then i set Kr = z and

zo = sqrt(2mVo) a / h

and then i graph it with cot(z) and sqrt[(zo/z)^2-1] and look for the intersections.

But I don't know why I do this, or what the graph means.

It tells me something about the bound states but I don't know what or why.

My teacher said it is used to solve the problem numerically, but why does it need to be solved numerically?

So any information on what this step in the solving process is for would be great
When you match the solutions at the boundary, you should get an equation you can't solve analytically, so you have to do it numerically.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top