Why Does the Tension in the Lower Rope Not Depend on Mass M1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tizzful
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tension
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the tension in two ropes supporting two hanging masses, M1 and M2, during upward acceleration. It is clarified that the tension in the lower rope (T2) only depends on the weight of M2, hence does not involve M1. For the upper rope (T1), the correct approach involves applying Newton's second law to account for the forces acting on M1, including its weight and the tension from the lower rope. The participants emphasize the importance of identifying all forces acting on each mass to derive the correct tension equations. The conversation highlights the distinction between equilibrium conditions and scenarios involving acceleration.
tizzful
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Two Hanging Masses (TENSION) :)

Homework Statement


Two blocks with masses M1 and M2 hag one under the other. For this problem take the positive direction to be upward and use g for the magnitude of the acceleration due to gravity. The blocks are now accelerating upwads (due to the tension in the strings) with acceleration of magnitude a. find the tension in the lower and upper rope.
Tension.jpg


Homework Equations


F=ma
W=mg


The Attempt at a Solution



I found the tension in the lower and upper rope when it was stationary and therefore in equilibrium.
T2=M2g
T1=M1g
Then to find the tension when accelerating I just used
T2=Ma+Mg
T1=Ma+M1g+M2g

For some reason it says that the tension in rope 2 does not depend on the variable M1... So I'm just really lost now on which direction to take..
Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF>

While acceleration T2 is the normal force arising only due to the weight of M2.
Hence T2 does not depend on variable M1.
 
Oh thank you! That clears up the first one but I'm still stuck on the T1 when accelerating. Would I just go T1=(M1+M2)a + (M1+M2)g?
 
Yes becoz the total downward force acting on T1 while acceleration is the sum of the weights of M1 and M2.
 
tizzful said:
I found the tension in the lower and upper rope when it was stationary and therefore in equilibrium.
T2=M2g
T1=M1g
That would be correct for M2 but not for T1 (three forces act on M1). In any case, the equilibrium situation is not relevant to this problem.
Then to find the tension when accelerating I just used
T2=Ma+Mg
T1=Ma+M1g+M2g
Carefully apply Newton's 2nd law to each mass. Start by identifying all the forces that act on each mass. (Hint: three forces act on M1.)

(The diagram is misleading because it does not show all the tension forces acting on the masses.)
 


first, solve for the T2.
T2=M1(g)
then, for T1,
since T1 is carrying the M2,
ΣF=ma
substitute ΣF to T2 + M1(g) -T1
so,
T2 + M1(g) -T1= ma (at rest)
T2 + M1(g) -T1= 0
T1=T2 + M1(g)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top