Why does the velocity fluctuate before gradually slowing down?

  • Thread starter Thread starter deaninator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The experiment with shake and go cars revealed that the velocity fluctuates rather than consistently increasing, with measurements showing variations at short time intervals. Possible explanations for this fluctuation include inconsistent surface roughness and variable power output from the motor. The data suggests that the velocities are relatively close, indicating that external conditions may affect the results. The discussion emphasizes the need for reasonable justifications for these fluctuations rather than absolute certainty. Understanding these factors can help in analyzing the car's performance over time.
deaninator
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Ok my group and I did an experiment relating to shake and go cars. I made an hypothesis that as time (seconds) goes on, then the car's velocity would go up gradually and then would slow down gradually. However though our data proved that as the time goes by, the velocity of the car doesn't simply go up. For example at 4.3 sec the velocity was 0.709 m/s. Then at 4.33 seconds the velocity was 0.714 m/s but at 4.4 sec the velocity was 0.696 m/s. And at 4.433 sec the velocity was 0.729. Why does the velocity fluctuate before gradually slowing down and how can I prove this?


Homework Equations


The shake and go car we used:
http://www.fisher-price.com/fp.aspx?st=4040&e=shakengoproduct&pcat=shakengo_racers&pid=32741


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
How are you calculating these velocities?
 
thrill3rnit3 said:
How are you calculating these velocities?

A motion detector.
 
There are several possible explanations. Did the surface that the can ran on have equal roughness? Maybe the motor wasn't producing consistent power (I'm using the term "power" loosely here)?

The conditions certainly weren't ideal so you can't pinpoint with absolute uncertainty as to why the velocity fluctuates. Plus the velocities seem pretty close to each other (within a given range).
 
thrill3rnit3 said:
There are several possible explanations. Did the surface that the can ran on have equal roughness? Maybe the motor wasn't producing consistent power (I'm using the term "power" loosely here)?

The conditions certainly weren't ideal so you can't pinpoint with absolute uncertainty as to why the velocity fluctuates. Plus the velocities seem pretty close to each other (within a given range).

Well yeah I don't have to be exact, I just some reasonable reasons why i did fluctuate. Now I just need to prove these reasons.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top