Why Don't Angular Momentum and the Square of Momentum Commute?

Legion81
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
I have been told that L and P^2 do not commute, but I don't see why. It seems like the commutator should be zero.

<br /> <br /> \left[ \vec{L} , P^2 \right] = \left[ L^k , P_i P_i \right]<br /> = \left[ L_k , P_i \right] P_i - P_i \left[ L_k , P_i \right]<br /> = \left( - i \hbar \epsilon_{i}^{km} P_m \right) P_i - P_i \left( - i \hbar \epsilon_{i}^{km} P_m \right) <br /> = - i \hbar \epsilon_{i}^{km} \left( P_m P_i - P_i P_m \right) <br /> = - i \hbar \epsilon_{i}^{km} \left[ P_m , P_i \right] <br /> = 0<br /> <br />

What is wrong with this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh, I found one mistake but it still leads me to the same conclusion. The second equality should be plus, not minus: [A,BC] = [A,B]C+B[A,C]:

<br /> \left[ \vec{L} , P^2 \right] = \left[ L^k , P_i P_i \right] = \left[ L^k , P_i \right] P_i + P_i \left[ L^k , P_i \right] = \left( - i \hbar \epsilon_{i}^{k m} P_m \right) P_i + P_i \left( - i \hbar \epsilon_{i}^{k m} P_m \right) = - i \hbar \epsilon_{i}^{k m} \left( P_m P_i + P_i P_m \right)<br />
and since P_m , P_i commute,
<br /> \left[ \vec{L} , P^2 \right] = - 2 i \hbar \epsilon_{i}^{k m} P_m P_i = 2 \left[ L^k , P_i \right] P_i = 2 \left[ \vec{L} , P^2 \right]<br />
but the only thing which satisfies
<br /> \left[ \vec{L} , P^2 \right] = 2 \left[ \vec{L} , P^2 \right]<br />
is zero.
So I'm back to saying that L and P^2 commute. Any ideas?
 
Last edited:
Your calculations are correct. If \hat{L}_i did not commute with \hat{P}^2, angular momentum would not be conserved for a free particle.
 
fzero, I didn't even think of that! A free particle would have zero potential energy, so for L to be conserved it would still have to commute with the Hamiltonian, and that means L and P^2 must commute (2m factor is irrelevant). I thought for sure I was making a mistake somewhere since my mind is a notorious hangout for mathematical absurdities. Maybe I can get some points back that were taken off on my test. Thanks.
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top