Why Is the Coefficient of Kinetic Friction Calculation Off by a Factor of 2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Leeoku
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque Wheel
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the effective coefficient of kinetic friction between a potter's wheel and a wet rag. The initial calculation yielded a coefficient of 0.64, but the correct answer is 0.321, attributed to an incorrect moment of inertia used in the calculations. The moment of inertia for a disk is I = mr^2/2, which was overlooked initially. Additionally, the importance of the center of mass in torque calculations is discussed, noting that it is crucial for scenarios involving free rotation or when the rotation axis does not pass through the center of mass. Understanding these concepts is essential for solving dynamics problems effectively.
Leeoku
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A potter's wheel—a thick stone disk with a radius of 0.450 m and a mass of 128 kg—is freely rotating at 52.0 rev/min. The potter can stop the wheel in 5.95 s by pressing a wet rag against the rim and exerting a radially inward force of 82.0 N. Calculate the effective coefficient of kinetic friction between the wheel and the rag.

Homework Equations


f_k = mu_k N
Torque = I*alpha (angular acceleration)= F*D

The Attempt at a Solution


I got most of it except i don't know why it is off by a factor of 2
Convert revs/min to angular accelearation
alpha = 52*2pi/60/5.95
=.915 s
Using Torque = I*alpha = F*d
F = I*alpha/d
= m(r^2)alpha/d
= 128kg*(.45m^2)*.915rads/s^2
--------------------------------------
.45 m
= 52.7 N
f_k = mu_k N
52.7 = 82mu_k
.64 = u

Correct answer is 0.321
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Check your moment of inertia.
 
oh there it is, i just noticed from my textbook I for disk = mr^2/2. thx!

Random side question, is it important to know centre of mass for moment of inertia questions? My prof didn't teach it yet and my test is 2moro and I'm scared of torque questions that might include it. What scenarios would require Centre of mass in torques
 
In scenarios that involves simple rotation about a fixed axis where only torques are interesting, the center of mass can usually be ignored. The center of mass becomes important when you have free rotation or need to know the bearing forces resulting from a rotation axis that do not pass through the center of mass. And for the general combined translational and rotational dynamics of rigid bodies, the center of mass is certainly a very important concept.

If you haven't been taught about center of mass yet it seems strange that your professor would give a test that requires such knowledge.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top