Why is the electric field intensity zero at only one point?

AI Thread Summary
The electric field intensity (EFI) is zero at only one point, (-4,0), due to the specific charge configuration of a 2uC charge at (0,0) and a -8uC charge at (4,0). At this point, the contributions to the EFI from both charges cancel each other out, as calculated using the formula for electric field strength. Other points, such as (-5,0) or (-6,0), do not yield a zero EFI because the magnitudes and directions of the electric fields from the two charges do not balance. The electric field is a vector field, requiring consideration of both magnitude and direction, which can be complex to visualize without computational tools. Thus, the unique cancellation occurs only at (-4,0).
imranq
Messages
57
Reaction score
1
Suppose you have a Cartesian coordinate system with:

a 2uC charge at (0,0) and a -8uC charge at (4,0), why is there only one point in which the EFI is zero (-4,0)? Shouldn't that be the first point where the EFI is zero (so (-5,0),(-6,0)... all have Electric Fields of zero)

The reason I think this is because if you drew the Electric field lines from one charge to the other, they wouldn't go either way infinitely.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Electric field strength is zero only at (-4,0) because field strength are given by (up to a multiplicative constant)
\displaymath{\frac{q}{r^2}}
so at (-4,0)
you have
\displaymath{\frac{2}{4^2}+\frac{-8}{(4+4)^2}=<br /> \frac{2}{16}-\frac{8}{64}=0}
whereas at (-5,0) you get
\displaymath{\frac{2}{5^2}+\frac{-8}{(5+4)^2}=<br /> \frac{2}{25}-\frac{8}{81} \neq 0}
 
I know that, but can you explain the field itself, since drawing the electric field lines doesn't seem to explain this
 
it is very hard to draw field lines to explain this, you will need a computer to help to do this properly. mind you an E-field is a vector field and at each spacetime point it has a magnitude and direction, so strictly speaking, to draw this properly you need to insert at each point a little vector, do this for each charge separately and you will find that only at (-4,0) will the magnitude be the same AND direction is opposite (ie cancel after doing the vector sum)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top