Why isn't this working? a simple inverse of a 2x2 matrix

  • Thread starter Thread starter mr_coffee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Matrix
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculation of the inverse of a 2x2 matrix A, specifically A = [-5, 3; 2, -9]. The user initially calculated the determinant incorrectly as 1/39, while the correct determinant is 39, derived from the formula ad-bc. To find the inverse, one must divide the adjoint matrix by the determinant, not the other way around. Clarifications were made regarding the calculation process, emphasizing that the inverse formula is 1/det(A) * adj(A). Correcting these misunderstandings will lead to the accurate computation of the matrix inverse.
mr_coffee
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
1
Okay i have a simple problem, and its not working!
I have the following:
Find a 2x2 matrix
A =
-5 3
2 -9

A-1 =
-3/13 -1/13
2/39 -5/39

A*A-1 = I
1 0
0 1

but its saying the inverse i got is wrong! how is this?
det i got was 1/39
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mr_coffee said:
Okay i have a simple problem, and its not working!
I have the following:
Find a 2x2 matrix
A =
-5 3
2 -9

A-1 =
-3/13 -1/13
2/39 -5/39

A*A-1 = I
1 0
0 1

but its saying the inverse i got is wrong! how is this?
det i got was 1/39

Your determinant is actually 39 (not 1/39). Divide the adjoint matrix by that and you should get your answer (provided you calculated the adjoint correctly).
 
Last edited:
thanks for the responce! But how did u get a det of -39? if a determinant is defined as
1/(ad-bc)?
so if i had
-5 3
2 -9

(-5)(-9) -(3)(2) = 45 - 6 = 39, and its under 1, so 1/39?
I also tried ur answer, when u say divide the adjoint matrix, do u mean divide the matrix after switching a and d, and negating b and c? I tried that and it was also wrong with ur det
 
mr_coffee said:
thanks for the responce! But how did u get a det of -39? if a determinant is defined as
1/(ad-bc)?
so if i had
-5 3
2 -9

(-5)(-9) -(3)(2) = 45 - 6 = 39, and its under 1, so 1/39?
I also tried ur answer, when u say divide the adjoint matrix, do u mean divide the matrix after switching a and d, and negating b and c? I tried that and it was also wrong with ur det

The determinant of a 2x2 matrix is ad-bc. I meant to say 39, not -39.
 
Last edited:
mr_coffee said:
thanks for the responce! But how did u get a det of -39? if a determinant is defined as
1/(ad-bc)?
No!

The inverse is 1/det(A) * adj(A) where 1/det(A) = 1/(ad-bc) so det(A) = ad-bc and not 1/(ad-bc).
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top