Why my friends wheel system won't reinforce itself

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a friend's flawed idea of a wheel system that supposedly reinforces itself through a series of connected wheels. The concept suggests that one large wheel turning would cause a smaller wheel to turn multiple times, creating a feedback loop. However, the mechanics of such a system are impossible because it would violate the principles of angular velocity, as two different speeds cannot exist on the same shaft. Additionally, the interference of the chains in the gearing system would prevent any movement. The conversation highlights a common misunderstanding of perpetual motion and mechanical systems.
AK1984
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I had a friend share an idea with me, and i said it was wrong, but he wouldn't believe me, mostly because I'm a layman and couldn't give more evidence than 'if it was that easy someone would've thought of it', or 'it's too close to perpetual motion which is impossible'.

The idea is you have a wheel system, (two wheels, one big one small, connected by a chain running around the outside, similar to a bicycle gear system) For simplicity say 1 turn of the big wheel causes 2 turns of the smaller wheel. That's fine, correct? Now he says suppose the smaller wheel has a rod connecting it's center to the center of another big wheel positioned right beside it. That big wheel is in turn connected by chain to another small wheel, which is positioned back next to the original wheel, also having a rod connecting its center to the original big wheel, creating a loop. My friend says since 1 turn of the first wheel causes 2 turns of the second, which should turn the big wheel its connected to by a rod through their centers 2 turns as well. Now 2 turns of this big wheel would turn the second small wheel 4 turns. That's all fine, right? But he says that last wheel will turn the original wheel 4 times as well, causing the next wheel to turn 8 times, and so forth etc. He says it just keeps turning on itself, in some sort of positive feedback system.

I tell him that's too close to perpetual motion, but he wants an actual answer why it wouldn't work, which i couldn't really give on my own.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The wheels won't turn. To make this simpler, imagine the first two wheels each have a sprocket and the sprockets are connected by a chain. Unless the smaller wheel's sprocket size is 1/2 the larger wheels sprocket size, the inner and outer chains interfere with each other and prevent any movement.
 
It can’t work. Suppose the original big wheel is turning at 1 rpm, then the small wheel it is geared to will be turning at 2 rpm. The second big wheel is on the same shaft as the small wheel, so it is also turning at 2 rpm. Now that second big wheel is geared to drive the last small wheel at 4 rpm. But your friend thinks that last small wheel can be on the same shaft as the original wheel that is turning at only one rpm! There cannot be two different angular velocities on the same shaft so nothing will turn; it will be locked up. It is sort of like having hinges on both sides of a door and trying to open it.

But your friend should not feel bad as there are still some people on this forum, including “physics mentors” who believe a wind-powered cart can go directly down wind faster than the wind that is powering it, based upon the same type of “logic” and “gearing”!
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top