Why would an object become lighter under water?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kaxa2000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Water
AI Thread Summary
An object submerged in water appears lighter due to the buoyant force, which equals the weight of the water displaced by the object. For a 1 cubic meter object, this displacement results in an upward force of 1000kg, counteracting its weight. Lowering the object further into the water does not increase its buoyancy, as it will still displace the same volume of water. The pressure in water acts uniformly in all directions, maintaining the upward force regardless of the object's depth. Therefore, the object does not become lighter with increased submersion, assuming constant water density.
Kaxa2000
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
If you suspend a large object beneath surface of a lake...it seems to weigh less than if it was above...why is this? Would it become even lighter if you kept lowering it into the water?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Kaxa2000 said:
If you suspend a large object beneath surface of a lake...it seems to weigh less than if it was above...why is this? Would it become even lighter if you kept lowering it into the water?
The object's weight is offset by the weight of water it displaces. If the object is 1 cubic metre, it will displace 1000kg of water. That 1000kg of water will try to push its way back into the space occupied by the object. In doing so, it will push up on the object with a force of 1000kg.

An object of sufficient rigidity will not get lighter if it is pushged deeper below the surface since it will displace no more than 1000kg of water at any depth.


Unless this is homework.

In which case: what are your thoughts?
 


Kaxa2000 said:
..why is this?
Why is a very good question.
The simple answer is that there is an upward force equal to the weight of the water displaced - but that doesn't really explain why!
The important thing to understand is that under the water the pressure acts in all directions.
If you had a cube of water under the surface there is a force upward exactly equal to the weight of the cube of water.
The water doesn't move so the force up must be equal to the weight of this cube.
No remove the cube and replace it with another cube of another material.
The force upward doesn't change - so the new cube has an upthrust equal to the weight of the cube of water

Would it become even lighter if you kept lowering it into the water?
No - assuming the density of the water doesn't change
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top