Work Done By A Force of Constant Magnitude in Moving an Object in a Circle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work done on a wagon being pulled in a circular path by a constant force at an angle. The initial approach suggests using the equation W=F*d*cos(θ) and finding the circumference to determine work as W=2πrFcos(θ). However, the student questions this conclusion by reasoning that the work should cancel out as the force direction changes around the circle. After exploring line integrals, the student finds that the dot product of the force and displacement is zero, leading to the belief that no work is done. Ultimately, the teacher asserts that the book's answer is correct, emphasizing that the force's direction aligns with the motion, resulting in positive work.
Zach Knight
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A wagon is drawn by a student pulling with a constant force of F Newtons applied at an angle of θ° to the horizontal. If the wagon is drawn in a circle with radius r meters, how much work is done on the wagon? (I don't remember the actual numbers)


Homework Equations


W=F*d*cos(θ)
W=\int_{C}\vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r}

The Attempt at a Solution


The teacher's solution manual proceeded as follows.
First, multiply the magnitude of the force by the cosine of the angle to the horizontal to obtain the force in the direction of motion. Then find the circumference of the circle to find the distance the wagon travels. Finally, find the product of these two quantities to find the work done on the wagon. This yields W=2\pirFcos(θ). I felt uneasy with this answer, though, so I began pondering the question on my own.

I considered the point on the circle where the wagon began and the point directly opposite it. I then imagined the wagon moved a small distance along the circle counterclockwise from both points. Since the magnitude of the force remains constant, and the displacements are in opposite directions, the work along the two paths should cancel. I continued this process until the whole circle was traversed and concluded that the work done must be zero.

I explained this line of reasoning to my teacher, but he denied its validity. I too was a bit uncertain because of its lack of rigor, so I approached the problem using line integrals.
I began by writing the displacement and force as functions of time. This yielded \vec{r}=r\cdot cos(\omega t)\hat{i}+r\cdot sin(\omega t)\hat{j} and \vec{F}=F\cdot cos(\theta)\cdot cos(\omega t)\hat{i}+F\cdot cos(\theta)\cdot sin(\omega t)\hat{j}, where \omega is the angular speed of the wagon. I then found the dot product of \vec{F} and \frac{d\vec{r}}{dt}, which was zero. The integral of this w.r.t. time from 0 to \frac{360}{\omega} was also zero.

I showed this to my teacher, but he doesn't know calculus; he just denied my argument again. Is the book correct, or am I?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The magnitude of the force may remain constant, but its direction changes all around the circle. In fact, it always points in the instantaneous direction of the motion. So there can be no cancellation -- the work is always positive when the force is in the same direction as the motion. The book is correct.
 
Okay. I think I see where I went wrong with the line integral approach too. Because the force is applied perpendicular to the motion, \vec{F} should equal -F\cdot cos(\theta) \cdot sin(\omega t)\hat{i}+F\cdot cos(\theta) \cdot cos(\omega t)\hat{j}.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top