Work Done by Theme Park Machine on Rider

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work done by a theme park machine on a rider being lifted to a height of 78 meters. The force exerted by the machine is represented as mg, but there is confusion regarding the normal force and whether it must exceed gravitational force to achieve upward acceleration. It is clarified that a force slightly greater than mg is sufficient to lift the rider at a constant speed, as the net force during this phase is minimal. The conversation also touches on the machine's design, suggesting it can hold multiple riders safely even when not in operation. Overall, the key point is understanding the relationship between the forces acting on the rider during the lift.
Balsam
Messages
226
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


A drop tower lifts riders at a constant speed to a height of 78m and suddenly drops them. Determine the work done on a 56kg rider by the machine as she is lifted to the top of the ride.
F=mg
displacement=78m
θ= 0 degrees

Homework Equations


W=FΔdcosθ

The Attempt at a Solution


I solved this problem, by plugging in mg as the force. But, I am confused. If you plug in mg as the force exerted by the machine on the rider, doesn't that mean that the normal force exerted on the rider is the force that lifts them up 78m. How does that make any sense? Shouldn't there be a force with a magnitude greater than Fg to lift the rider up. Doesn't having Fn and Fg as the only y component forces mean that there's no (Fnet)y? That would mean there's no acceleration in the y component, which there is because the rider is lifted up 78m. Can someone please explain this to me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fnet = T - mg = ma
Where; T = tension (at rest).

The problem statement seems to be only concerned with the amount of acceleration force needed to lift the '56kg rider'.

Can we presume that the machine is designed to hold multiple riders even when turned off, such that energy is only consumed through acceleration?
 
Balsam said:

Homework Statement


A drop tower lifts riders at a constant speed to a height of 78m and suddenly drops them. Determine the work done on a 56kg rider by the machine as she is lifted to the top of the ride.
F=mg
displacement=78m
θ= 0 degrees

Homework Equations


W=FΔdcosθ

The Attempt at a Solution


I solved this problem, by plugging in mg as the force. But, I am confused. If you plug in mg as the force exerted by the machine on the rider, doesn't that mean that the normal force exerted on the rider is the force that lifts them up 78m. How does that make any sense? Shouldn't there be a force with a magnitude greater than Fg to lift the rider up. Doesn't having Fn and Fg as the only y component forces mean that there's no (Fnet)y? That would mean there's no acceleration in the y component, which there is because the rider is lifted up 78m. Can someone please explain this to me?
A force only slightly higher than mg is all that is required to lift the rider.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...

Similar threads

Back
Top