Work function of a cathode, when the wavelength of light is increased by 50%

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the work function of a cathode in the context of the photoelectric effect. The original poster presents a scenario where the maximum kinetic energy of photoelectrons changes as the wavelength of light is increased by 50%. Participants are exploring the relationship between kinetic energy, wavelength, and work function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to relate changes in kinetic energy to the work function using equations derived from the photoelectric effect. Some participants suggest rewriting equations to express kinetic energy in terms of wavelength and work function. Others question the calculations and seek clarification on the relationships between the variables involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on setting up equations to solve for the work function. There are indications of attempts to solve the problem, but also expressions of uncertainty regarding calculations and results. One participant mentions a mathematical error that was later corrected, leading to a successful resolution of their query.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of the problem statement, which specifies changes in kinetic energy and wavelength. There is an emphasis on ensuring correct application of the equations related to the photoelectric effect.

Tina20
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The maximum kinetic energy of photoelectrons is 3.14 eV. When the wavelength of the light is increased by 50.0 %, the maximum energy decreases to 1.11 eV. What is the work function of the cathode?

Homework Equations



Kmax = E elec - E not
= hf - hfnot

hf = hc/lambda

*Enot is the work function

Kfinal-Kinital = hf - hfnot

The Attempt at a Solution




Kf = 1.11 eV
Ki = 3.14 eV

change in K = -2.03

From there, I do not know what to do. I don't know how I would go about finding the work function (hfnot)

Can someone please tell me what I should be doing/equating? Your help would be greatly appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So i thought of converting the equation I posted below to:

Kmax = hc/lambda - hc/lambda not

because hf = hc/lambda

So if Kmax = -2.03
and h*c = 1.989x10^-25

Then the equation would be as follows:

-2.03 eV = 1.989x10^-25/lambda - 1.989x10^-25/lambda not

now in the question it states that the wavelength was increased by 50%. So I tried to solve the equation with lambda = 1.50 lambda and lambda not staying as lambda.

So the equation then looked like:

-2.03 eV = 1.989x10^-25 (1/1.5 lambda - 1/ lambda)

I converted -2.03 eV * 1.60x10^-19 J/ 1ev = 3.248x10^-19 J ( I decided to take out the negative because my final answer would have negative energy which wouldn't make sense.

3.248x10^-19 J = 1.989x10^-25 (1/1.5 lambda - 1/ lambda)
1632981.398 = 1/1.5 lambda - 1/lambda
1632981.398 = 1/0.5 lambda
1.22475x10^-6 = lambda

Enot = hc/lambda
Enot = 1.624x10^-19 J

This answer was incorrect. Can someone please reply and provide some guidance. Thank you!

Tina
 
Good morning, Tina.
I'm used to W for the work function: E = hc/λ - W.
Write this once for the first wavelength: E1 = hc/λ - W
and again for λ increased to 1.5λ: E2 = hc/(1.5λ) - W
You have two equations with two unknowns, λ and W.
Solve one equation for λ and sub into the other to find W.
I get about 3 times the answer you have.
 
Ok, thank you for your help, I will work on it right now :)
 
So I solved for lambda and got an answer of 3,265962.795 m for lambda

I substituted that into the equation:

E2 = hc/1.5 lambda - W

I got an answer of 1.776x10^-19 J for -W.

I inputted with positive value of the answer into the computer and it says the answer is wrong. Is my answer above what you roughly got?
 
Nevermind! I made a mathematical error. I solved the question and got the right answer! Thank you so much!

I posted another post in regards to a proton being fired towards on Oxygen nucleus and I need to find the velocity at which the proton needs to be fired towards the oxygen nucleus. I think I equated my equations wrong, but if you could take a look at my post and give me any pointers I would really appreciate it :)

Thank you Delphi51
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
36K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K