Work function of a cathode, when the wavelength of light is increased by 50%

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work function of a cathode given the maximum kinetic energy of photoelectrons at two different wavelengths of light. Initially, the maximum kinetic energy is 3.14 eV, which decreases to 1.11 eV when the wavelength is increased by 50%. Participants suggest using the equations E = hc/λ - W for both wavelengths to derive two equations with two unknowns, λ and W. After some trial and error, one user successfully solves for the work function after correcting a mathematical error. The thread concludes with a request for assistance on a separate physics problem involving a proton and an oxygen nucleus.
Tina20
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The maximum kinetic energy of photoelectrons is 3.14 eV. When the wavelength of the light is increased by 50.0 %, the maximum energy decreases to 1.11 eV. What is the work function of the cathode?

Homework Equations



Kmax = E elec - E not
= hf - hfnot

hf = hc/lambda

*Enot is the work function

Kfinal-Kinital = hf - hfnot

The Attempt at a Solution




Kf = 1.11 eV
Ki = 3.14 eV

change in K = -2.03

From there, I do not know what to do. I don't know how I would go about finding the work function (hfnot)

Can someone please tell me what I should be doing/equating? Your help would be greatly appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So i thought of converting the equation I posted below to:

Kmax = hc/lambda - hc/lambda not

because hf = hc/lambda

So if Kmax = -2.03
and h*c = 1.989x10^-25

Then the equation would be as follows:

-2.03 eV = 1.989x10^-25/lambda - 1.989x10^-25/lambda not

now in the question it states that the wavelength was increased by 50%. So I tried to solve the equation with lambda = 1.50 lambda and lambda not staying as lambda.

So the equation then looked like:

-2.03 eV = 1.989x10^-25 (1/1.5 lambda - 1/ lambda)

I converted -2.03 eV * 1.60x10^-19 J/ 1ev = 3.248x10^-19 J ( I decided to take out the negative because my final answer would have negative energy which wouldn't make sense.

3.248x10^-19 J = 1.989x10^-25 (1/1.5 lambda - 1/ lambda)
1632981.398 = 1/1.5 lambda - 1/lambda
1632981.398 = 1/0.5 lambda
1.22475x10^-6 = lambda

Enot = hc/lambda
Enot = 1.624x10^-19 J

This answer was incorrect. Can someone please reply and provide some guidance. Thank you!

Tina
 
Good morning, Tina.
I'm used to W for the work function: E = hc/λ - W.
Write this once for the first wavelength: E1 = hc/λ - W
and again for λ increased to 1.5λ: E2 = hc/(1.5λ) - W
You have two equations with two unknowns, λ and W.
Solve one equation for λ and sub into the other to find W.
I get about 3 times the answer you have.
 
Ok, thank you for your help, I will work on it right now :)
 
So I solved for lambda and got an answer of 3,265962.795 m for lambda

I substituted that into the equation:

E2 = hc/1.5 lambda - W

I got an answer of 1.776x10^-19 J for -W.

I inputted with positive value of the answer into the computer and it says the answer is wrong. Is my answer above what you roughly got?
 
Nevermind! I made a mathematical error. I solved the question and got the right answer! Thank you so much!

I posted another post in regards to a proton being fired towards on Oxygen nucleus and I need to find the velocity at which the proton needs to be fired towards the oxygen nucleus. I think I equated my equations wrong, but if you could take a look at my post and give me any pointers I would really appreciate it :)

Thank you Delphi51
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top