Work of Electric Field Problem, can't find mistake

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem related to calculating the work done in assembling four charges. The user initially struggles with part D of the problem, specifically how to compute the total work using the formula W=qV. After sharing their calculations for the x and y components and the electric potential, they consider whether to calculate the potential energy for each charge separately. A suggestion is made to use the formula V=kQ/R for each charge in relation to a reference point, allowing for the addition of the potentials based on charge signs to find the total work. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying formulas and considering the contributions of each charge.
jigs90
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I posted the question on cramster at
http://answerboard.cramster.com/physics- ...
so you could see the picture.



Homework Equations



W = qV = kq1q2 / r

The Attempt at a Solution



I figure out A, B, and C, (which are the x component, y component, and the electric potential, but I can't figure out how to do part D, (which is the work to asseble the four charges). Please help! I tried to you W=qV, but that didn't work.

My Answers were
A) was 24.4
B) was 77.96
C) was 2.719x10^3

Work done in assembling +6 uF and -6uF is zero

Total work =kq1q2/r=9*10^9*8.2*16.4*10^-12/(47sin(60

Total work =2.97*10^-2 J
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The link was

http://answerboard.cramster.com/physics-topic-5-189871-0.aspx

sorry
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wait, should I calculate each PE separately and then add them together? Would there be 6 different PEs?
 
Figured it out...
 
Upon brief inspection, What I would do is use the formula V= kQ/R for each point in relation to P. Then you can add these based on the sign of the charge to solve for W=qV. Give that a try.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top