Work Required to Stretch Spring 4-7 ft: 8.4 ft-lbs

blessedcurse
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The amount of WORK to stretch a spring 4 feet beyond its natural length of 2 feet is 10 ft-lbs. Find the work required to stretch the spring from 4 feet to 7 feet.

Homework Equations



W=\int^{b}_{a}Fdx=\int^{b}_{a}kxdx=[kx^{2}/2]^{b}_{a}

The Attempt at a Solution



10=[kx^{2}/2]^{4}_{0}
10=k(16)/2-k(0)/2
10=8k
k=4/5

W=[kx^{2}/2]^{b}_{a}
W=4/5[x^{2}/2]^{5}_{2}
W=4(25)/10-4(4)/10
W=42/5

W=8.4 ft*lb
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you explain your limits of integration? The spring is either being stretched from 0 to 6 ft or from 2 to 6 ft, I don't see where you got 0 to 4 from.
 
It's being stretched 4 feet beyond its natural length of 2 feet, so the natural length is the 0 and then 4 feet beyond that is 4.

At first I had 2 to 6, but then I realized that that meant stretching it from 2 feet beyond its natural length to 6 feet beyond it because the limits refer to change in distance... so the change in distance is 0 to 4.
 
Oh, I see. Sorry, that is a badly worded question (or more likely I read it badly). I thought it meant it's being stretched four feet beyond it's elestic limit! My bad.

Given that is true I think your answer is correct, at least in it's principle (Ihaven't checked the numerics).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top