Writing Kirchhoff Rules for a Multi-Loop Circuit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on writing Kirchhoff's rules for a multi-loop circuit in a programming context, with an emphasis on ensuring the accuracy of the equations. Initial equations presented neglect certain resistances, leading to confusion about the correct number of currents and loops. Participants clarify that there are four independent loops, necessitating four loop equations. A key point is the importance of maintaining consistent current direction when applying Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) to avoid errors. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the need for precise definitions of current directions in the equations.
carterq
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to write Kirchhoff rues for the following circuit. This is not for a physics class, but for a programming class. I can do that part, but I am not sure if the equations are correct.

Homework Equations


upload_2017-4-25_11-6-13.png


The Attempt at a Solution


V1-I1*R1-(I1-I2)R3-I1*R2=0
V2-(I2-I3)R5-I2*R4-(I2-I1)R3=0
V3-I3*R6-I3*R7-(I3-I2)R5=0
These neglect R8, however.
Should I also include:
V1-I1*R1-(I1-I2)R3-(I1-I2)R4-(I1-I3)R7-I1*R8=0
V2-(I2-I3)R5-(I2-I3)R7-(I2-I1)R8-(I2-I1)R2-(I2-I1)R3=0
V3-I3*R6-(I1-I3)R8-(I3-I1)R2-(I3-I2)R4-(I3-I2)R5=0
These last three equations seem really wrong. I am not sure how many currents there even are.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2017-04-25 at 11.00.16 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-04-25 at 11.00.16 AM.png
    7.2 KB · Views: 581
  • Screen Shot 2017-04-25 at 11.00.16 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-04-25 at 11.00.16 AM.png
    7.2 KB · Views: 618
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!
carterq said:
I am not sure how many currents there even are.
For writing KVL, take no of currents= no of meshes (smallest loops). You can see 4 meshes here, so assume four currents.

See this example.
download (1).png

You can now write the current through each resistor in terms of i1, i2 and i3. For example, current through the 25 ohm resistance is i1-i2 downward.
 
  • Like
Likes TomHart
carterq said:

Homework Statement


I need to write Kirchhoff rues for the following circuit. This is not for a physics class, but for a programming class. I can do that part, but I am not sure if the equations are correct.

The Attempt at a Solution


V1-I1*R1-(I1-I2)R3-I1*R2=0
V2-(I2-I3)R5-I2*R4-(I2-I1)R3=0
V3-I3*R6-I3*R7-(I3-I2)R5=0
These neglect R8, however.
So they are wrong. Why did you write them?
carterq said:
Should I also include:
V1-I1*R1-(I1-I2)R3-(I1-I2)R4-(I1-I3)R7-I1*R8=0
V2-(I2-I3)R5-(I2-I3)R7-(I2-I1)R8-(I2-I1)R2-(I2-I1)R3=0
V3-I3*R6-(I1-I3)R8-(I3-I1)R2-(I3-I2)R4-(I3-I2)R5=0
These last three equations seem really wrong. I am not sure how many currents there even are.

These equations are also wrong.
Choose loops and loop currents and draw the currents clearly. Note that you have 4 independent loops, so you need to write 4 loop equations.
This is a possible arrangement:

upload_2017-4-26_7-34-43.png
 
  • Like
Likes CWatters
So these are the new equations that I came up with, but something still is not quite right:
V1-I1*R1-(I1-I2)*R3-(I1-I4)*R2=0
V2-(I2-I3)*R5-(I2-I4)*R4-(I2-I1)*R3=0
V3-(I3-I2)*R5-(I3-I4)*R7-I3*R6=0
I4*R8+(I4-I1)*R2+(I4-I2)*R4+(I4-I3)*R7=0
 
In your third equation you ignored the defined current direction of I3. You did your "KVL walk" around the loop counterclockwise, which is fine, but you wrote the equations as though you were going in the direction if I3 rather than against it. For example, I3 should cause a potential rise as you pass through R5.

Once you've defined the direction of a current and used it in other equations you must stick to what you've defined.
 
Thank you! That makes sense.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top