Young's modulus in microscopic terms

Mathsboi
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


By considering the force-separation curve for two adjacent atoms in a solid, f(x), show that the Young’s modulus can be expressed on the microscopic scale as:
Y = - \frac{1}{x_0} \frac{df}{dx}\right| |_{x=x_0}
(the | is meant to go allt he way form the top to bottom of df/dx)
where x_0 is the equilibrium separation of the atoms

Homework Equations



f(x) = - \left(\frac{A}{x}\right)^7 + \left(\frac{B}{x}\right)^{13}
(I'm assuming A and B should be 1 angstrom so 1E-10m)

The Attempt at a Solution


x_0 is found by doing f(x).dx = 0 to find where f(x) crosses the x axis.
E \equiv \frac{\mbox {tensile stress}}{\mbox {tensile strain}} = \frac{\sigma}{\varepsilon}= \frac{F/A_0}{\Delta L/L_0} = \frac{F L_0} {A_0 \Delta L}
Y is the gradient of stress/straing graph

hmmmm
:(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't exactly read your equations but a long time ago I remember doing an analysis based on a typical diamond lattice structure whereby you could show that Posson's ration came out correctly ( approximatley 1/3) if you assumed that the bond lengths stayed the same and only the bond angles were deformed.
 
Mathsboi said:

Homework Statement


By considering the force-separation curve for two adjacent atoms in a solid, f(x), show that the Young’s modulus can be expressed on the microscopic scale as:
Y = - \frac{1}{x_0} \frac{df}{dx}\right| |_{x=x_0}
(the | is meant to go allt he way form the top to bottom of df/dx)
where x_0 is the equilibrium separation of the atoms

Homework Equations



f(x) = - \left(\frac{A}{x}\right)^7 + \left(\frac{B}{x}\right)^{13}
(I'm assuming A and B should be 1 angstrom so 1E-10m)

The Attempt at a Solution


x_0 is found by doing f(x).dx = 0 to find where f(x) crosses the x axis.
E \equiv \frac{\mbox {tensile stress}}{\mbox {tensile strain}} = \frac{\sigma}{\varepsilon}= \frac{F/A_0}{\Delta L/L_0} = \frac{F L_0} {A_0 \Delta L}
Y is the gradient of stress/straing graph

hmmmm
:(

What's E =F L_0/A_0 \Delta L in differential form? What's a reasonable estimate for A_0 on the atomic scale?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top