Z for classical particles in B-field

cscott
Messages
778
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Show that the free energy of classical particles with no internal magnetic moment is always independent of magnetic field. Hint: Write down Z for N classical particles. Let the particles interact by U which depends only on the positions of the interacting particles. Show that the magnetic field dependence can be eliminated from the partition function by a change of variable.

Homework Equations



Partition function
Z = \frac{1}{N!} = \int \exp \left (-\beta H \right) d^3p_1..d^3p_Nd^3x_1..d^3x_N

Free energy:
\Omega = -\frac{\ln(Z)}{\beta}

The Attempt at a Solution



I would start by trying to write down H
H = \sum_n \left [ \frac{\vec{p_n}^2}{2m_n} + U(\vec{r_n}) \right]

but I don't know how to make any more use of that hint.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If there's no magnetic moment, the particles couple to the magnetic field through the momentum term via

<br /> H = \sum_n \left [ \frac{(\vec{p_n}-q\vec{A})^2}{2m_n} + U(\vec{r_n}) \right]<br />

where \vec{A} is the scalar potential and q is the charge of a single particle.
 
So because U has nothing to do with the magnetic field, I need to eliminate the vector potential from,

\Pi_n \int \exp \left [-\frac{\beta}{2m_n} (\vec{p}_n - q \vec{A})^2 \right] d^3 p_n

and change variable,

\vec{u}_n = \vec{p_n}-q\vec{A}

thus eliminating vector potential?

Are the end points of the integral +/-infinity?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top