Zeroes of zeta function as energy levels?

nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,748
Reaction score
243
In "A Prime Case of Chaos" (http://www.ams.org/samplings/math-history/prime-chaos.pdf), the author states that "Physicists ... believe the zeroes of the zeta function can be interpreted as energy levels..." I have two problems with this:

(1) the non-trivial zeroes of the zeta function are complex numbers, and energy levels, are real numbers. So how could you interpret something like (1/2) + (14.134725)i as an energy level? Did he perhaps mean their probability amplitudes? But this would not give the same values, for example, as the Rydberg series.

(2) the three dots in the above quote say that this is tied to the zeta function being a trace formula. Following this lead, the best my very limited background in the mathematics needed for this physics could come up with, was in "Selberg trace formula and zeta functions" at http://empslocal.ex.ac.uk/people/staff/mrwatkin//zeta/physics4.htm, where it explains:

"Selberg trace formula ... relates ... the spectrum of the quantal motion on compact surfaces of negative curvature ...; however, it does not address itself ...to ... the detailed properties of the discrete energy spectrum ..."

which appears to lead to a dead end.

If a response gives any sources, could they please be on-line sources that are freely accessible?

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Excellent. Thank you, peteratcam.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top