Introduction to Rings and Fields- Help

Thread starter Palindrom
Start date Dec 12, 2004
Tags

Fields Introduction Rings

AI Thread Summary

The discussion focuses on finding an alternative method to define a homomorphism for the problem involving the isomorphism of Q[x]/(x-1) and Q[x]/(x-2). Participants suggest that both rings can be shown to be isomorphic to a third ring, specifically Q. The conversation highlights the challenge of completing homework late at night, indicating a common struggle among students. Overall, the key takeaway is the exploration of isomorphism in ring theory and the potential for simplification through a third ring comparison. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding ring structures in abstract algebra.

Dec 12, 2004

Palindrom

I really don't want to define a homomorphism like
psi(p(x))=p(x-1+I
I'm looking for another way to solve that next question:

Show that Q[x]/(x-1) is isomorphic to Q[x]/(x-2).
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.

Physics news on Phys.org

Dec 12, 2004

Hurkyl

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

You could show they're both isomorphic to a third ring...

Dec 12, 2004

Palindrom

Hurkyl said:

You could show they're both isomorphic to a third ring...

Of course, they're both isomorphic to Q... I really shouldn't do HW at 11 pm... Thanks!

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .

View full post »

Thread 'I've come across another fluid pressure problem I don't understand'

Neglect gravity other than that of water; neglect friction. F1=ρgsh=1000*10*1*(1+4)=50000 N; F1=ρgsh=1000*10*0.1*4=4000 N; F3=50000-4000=46000 N?

View full post »

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

View full post »