Photoelectric effect white light

AI Thread Summary
White light with wavelengths from 380 to 750 nm is incident on a metal with a work function of 2.46 eV. The energy of the photon is calculated using the formula E = hf, resulting in E_max = 2.6504E-19 Joules. To find the maximum kinetic energy (KE_max) of the emitted electrons, the equation KE_max = E_max - W_o is used. Given that W_o is 2.46 eV, the calculation involves converting this value to Joules for accurate subtraction. The discussion emphasizes the relationship between photon energy, wavelength, and the kinetic energy of photoelectrons.
Alt+F4
Messages
305
Reaction score
0
White light (ranging in wavelengths from 380 to 750 nm) is incident on a metal with work function Wo = 2.46 eV.
(a) What is the maximum kinetic energy of the electrons emitted from the surface?

KEmax = eV


E = hf = hc/lamda.

E = (6.626*10^-34)(3*10^8) / (750*10^-9) = 2.6504E-19

I know to get KEmax i need to do 2.35- something = 0


Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that energy of the photon is 'inversely proportional' to wavelength, and directly proportional to frequency.

The KEmax(photoelectron) = Emax(photon) - Wo
 
Astronuc said:
Note that energy of the photon is 'inversely proportional' to wavelength, and directly proportional to frequency.

The KEmax(photoelectron) = Emax(photon) - Wo
so i found emax which was 2.65E-19 right? so wat i would do is 2.65E-19 - 2.35?
 
Your E_max value is the energy contained within the photon of light.
For every photon absorbed (E_max worth of energy), some amount of that energy is spent removing the electron from the metal and the rest goes into the KE of the electron.

KE_max_electron = E_max - W_o
You are given a value for W_o in terms of electronvolts (a unit of energy) and you have previously calculated the E_max value, so you should be able to calculate from here the max KE value of the electron.

1 eV = 1.602176462 E-19 Joules
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top