Error Propagation: Calculating Puck's X-Velocity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the error in a puck's x-velocity given its speed and angle. Two methods are proposed for error propagation: one using partial derivatives and the other based on proportionality of errors. The first method yields an expression involving both the velocity and angle errors, while the second suggests a different approach using relative uncertainties. Confusion arises over which method is more appropriate, as both yield different results. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding error propagation techniques in physics.
asleight
Messages
152
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given that a puck's velocity is speed v at an angle \theta (measured in radians) with the x-axis, we know that the puck's x-velocity is v\cos(\theta). Given the error in v is \sigma_v and the error in \theta is \sigma_\theta, what is the resulting error in the puck's x-velocity?


The Attempt at a Solution



Solving for partials, we get:

\sigma_{v_{x}}=\sqrt{\left(\cos(\theta)\sigma_{v}\right)^2+\left(-v\sin(\theta)\sigma_{\theta}\right)^2}.

Or, using proportionalities of errors, we find:

\sigma_{v_{x}}=\sqrt{\left(\frac{\sigma_{v}}{v}\right)^2{v_{x}}^2+\left(\frac{\sigma_{\theta}}{\theta}\right)^2{v_{x}}^2}.

These yield two different values... Which is a real propagation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This link touches on dealing with error propagation for angles.
http://instructor.physics.lsa.umich.edu/ip-labs/tutorials/errors/prop.html

Since you are interested in the product of two measured values that would suggest that your second method would be the final step.

But arriving at the fractional uncertainty of the Trig function suggests finding the absolute uncertainty in the function first.

By the Rule 4 at the link I cited above you might model that as σf = dF(θ)/dθ = σθSinθ

From that calculate the relative uncertainty as σθSinθ/Cosθ = σθTanθ ?

By my method I think that would make it

σvx = ((σv/v)2 + (σθTanθ)2)1/2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
LowlyPion said:
This link touches on dealing with error propagation for angles.
http://instructor.physics.lsa.umich.edu/ip-labs/tutorials/errors/prop.html

Since you are interested in the product of two measured values that would suggest that your second method would be the final step.

But arriving at the fractional uncertainty of the Trig function suggests finding the absolute uncertainty in the function first.

By the Rule 4 at the link I cited above you might model that as σf = dF(θ)/dθ = σθSinθ

From that calculate the relative uncertainty as σθSinθ/Cosθ = σθTanθ ?

Thank you, Lowly, but I guess I'm still confused. All year we've used the RSS of the partials to show the error in the unknown parameter but, recently, my TA introduced the idea of proportionality of squares. That is, (dC/C)^2 = (dA/A)^2+(dB/B)^2. Which is right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
By my method I think that would make it

σvx = ((σv/v)2 + (σθTanθ)2)1/2
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top