What is the value of r given the change in electric potential?

AI Thread Summary
The electric potential at a distance r from a positive point charge is initially 45V and increases to 50V when the distance decreases by 1.5m. The correct value of r is determined to be 15m. The discussion emphasizes using the equation V=(1/4∏ε) q/r and suggests taking the ratio of potentials to simplify the problem. Participants provide algebraic guidance to eliminate unknowns and solve for r. The final consensus confirms that the calculated answer is mathematically sound.
mrcotton
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
The electric potential at a distance r from a positive point charge is 45V. The potential
increases to 50 V when the distance from the charge decreases by 1.5 m. What is the
value of r?

A 1.3m
B 1.5m
C 7.9m
D 15m

Homework Statement



the answer is D

Homework Equations


V=(1/4∏ε) q/r
v proportional to 1/r

The Attempt at a Solution


5=(q/(1/4∏ε))*((1/r-1.5)-(1/r))

How embarrassing I just can’t get my head around this one. Am I setting the equation up correct to solve.
If I have I need desperate help with the algebra.
Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org


mrcotton said:
The electric potential at a distance r from a positive point charge is 45V. The potential
increases to 50 V when the distance from the charge decreases by 1.5 m. What is the
value of r?

A 1.3m
B 1.5m
C 7.9m
D 15m

Homework Statement



the answer is D

Homework Equations


V=(1/4∏ε) q/r
v proportional to 1/r

The Attempt at a Solution


5=(q/(1/4∏ε))*((1/r-1.5)-(1/r))

How embarrassing I just can’t get my head around this one. Am I setting the equation up correct to solve.
If I have I need desperate help with the algebra.
Thank you
You have one equation and two unknowns.

Taking the ratio \displaystyle \ \ \frac{V(r)}{V(r-1.5)}\ \ might be more helpful.

Otherwise, use your equation along with \displaystyle \ \ V(r)=45=\frac{q}{4\pi\epsilon_0\,r}\ \ then eliminate q & solve for r.
 


You're going to want to get rid of the constants you don't have values for (like the charge value q) so you'll probably want to set it up as a ratio so that they'll cancel out.

EDIT: SammyS got their first!
 


Thank you guys.
I did it like this with your help.
Is this mathematicaly sound.
Thanks
Mr C
electrostaic_zpsf9de5785.jpg
 


mrcotton said:
Thank you guys.
I did it like this with your help.
Is this mathematically sound.
Thanks
Mr C
attachment.php?attachmentid=54562&stc=1&d=1357706512.jpg
That answer is correct.
 

Attachments

  • electrostaic_zpsf9de5785.jpg
    electrostaic_zpsf9de5785.jpg
    4.8 KB · Views: 1,452
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top