Quality Factor of Oscillator, Can someone Look at My Work Please

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculation of the quality factor of an oscillator, specifically regarding the energy radiated by an accelerated electron. The user initially finds the energy radiated over one cycle correctly, but encounters a discrepancy in the quality factor calculation, where their result includes a factor of 2 instead of the expected 4. They derive the energy stored and dissipated per cycle but are unsure where their calculations diverge from the answer key. The user mentions using an approximation for small values, which may influence the outcome. Clarification is sought on the calculations to identify the source of the factor discrepancy.
mmmboh
Messages
401
Reaction score
0
Hi, so I did the question, but apparently my answer is off by a factor of 2.

An accelerated electron radiates energy at the rate Ke2a2/c3...e is the electron charge, a is the instantaneous acceleration, c is the speed of light, K=6x109Nm2/C2...whatever that is.

So first I had to find how much energy an electron oscillating in a straight line would radiate over one cycle, the motion is describe by x=Asin(2\pift), I did that and according to the answer book I am right, it is Ke28A2pi4f3/c3.

For the next part I have to find the quality factor...I know that is 2\pi x energy stored/energy dissipated per cycle, and the energy stored is 1/2 kA2, and since k=w0m the energy stored becomes (1/2)4pi2f2mA2...when I do that times 2\pi, and then divide that by the energy dissipated over one cycle that I found in the first part, I get as an answer mc3/(2Ke2pif)...but according to the answer book the denominator should be multiplied by a factor of 4, not two...

Am I missing something here? I can't figure out where my mistake is..
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
can anyone clear this up please?
 
I am getting same results as you
factor of 2 , not 4.
I used the aproximation of ln(1-x)=-x if x<1 assuming the radiation is not taking too much energy of the electron
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top