Electric field inside a sphere of charge density A/r

AI Thread Summary
The electric field inside a sphere with a charge density of ρ = A/r is calculated using Gauss' law, resulting in E = A/(2ε₀), which surprisingly shows no dependence on radius R. This independence arises because the total charge within the sphere increases with R², while the surface area over which the electric field spreads also increases with R², leading to a cancellation of effects. The integration of the charge density over the sphere clarifies this relationship. Additionally, there is a discussion on the integration process in spherical coordinates, highlighting common integrals encountered in calculus. Understanding these concepts is essential for grasping the behavior of electric fields in varying charge distributions.
Repetit
Messages
128
Reaction score
2
What is the electric field inside a sphere of radius R when the charge density is given by:
\rho=\frac{A}{r}
Where A is a constant, and r is the radius at where the charge density is to be evaluated. By Gauss' law I have calculated the field to be equal to:
E=\frac{A}{2\epsilon_0}
But that seems quite odd as the field is then independent of the radius. But could this be explained by the fact that the charge density is inversely proportional to the radius?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's correct. If you integrate the charge density over a sphere of radius R it's a little easier to see why this is so:

\int_0^R \int_0^{2 \pi} \int_0^{\pi} \rho r^2 \sin^2\theta d\theta d\phi dr
\int_0^R \int_0^{2 \pi} \int_0^{\pi} A r \sin^2\theta d\theta d\phi dr
A 4 \pi \int_0^R r dr
A 2 \pi R^2

So, the amount of charge which is inside a sphere of radius R increases with the square of the radius. The surface area of that sphere which the electric field lines are spread out over also increases with R^2, although it's larger by a factor of two. This is why there is no R dependence on the electric field, the two competing effects of total charge and surface area over which the electric field is spread cancel out.
 
I'm just starting my second Calculus course, those nested integrals look fun :eek:
 
Ubern0va said:
I'm just starting my second Calculus course, those nested integrals look fun :eek:

It's really not bad, you just start on the inside and work your way out. With a lot of problems you run into the same integrals over and over again and you just end up memorizing the answer, for instance:

\int_0^{2 \pi} \int_0^{\pi} \sin^2\theta d\theta d\phi = 4 \pi

comes up all the time (such as in this problem).
 
This is good, except I'm pretty sure the volume element on that integral is r2 sin[theta] dr d[theta] d[phi] for spherical coordinates instead of having a sin2 [theta] component. This is from Griffith's Intro to E&M
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top