The discussion centers on the resultant time period when two simple harmonic motions with periods of 3 seconds and 4 seconds are superimposed. It suggests that the term "resultant time period" may not be precise, as the focus could be on the period of the resulting waveform or "beats" created by the superposition of different frequencies. A mathematical approach is proposed, using the formula for oscillations to derive a resultant time period of 5 seconds, although it is noted that time periods cannot be simply added as vectors. The conversation also touches on the idea of the least common multiple (LCM) in relation to the observed graph of the combined waves. Overall, the analysis emphasizes the complexity of superimposing simple harmonic motions and the need for careful interpretation of resultant periods.
#1
the_terminator
2
0
what is the resultant time period when two simple harmonic motions of time periods 3s and 4s superimpose
Try making an Excel plot to see what happens when you add two sine waves like that. BTW, "resultant time period" is not a precise term -- the original question probably asked for the period of the waveform or something? When you add sound waves of two different frequencies, for example, you get what are called "beats" where the superposition sound gets louder and softer at a specific rate. That may be what the question is asking for you to figure out -- what is the period of the beats when you add these two signals...
#3
row
9
0
i think it may be solved this way but not sure if it is right,
let y=Asin(wt+θ) for T=3
and Y=Asin(wt)for T=4 in 1 sec, Y shm reaches an extreme,this implies that
at the other extreme it reaches at t=3 sec (by symmetry)
ie.the shm y completed 1 ossicilation
hence phase diff. of ∏/2
hence although T is not vector one can always relate it to velocity or acc.
hence resultant T=√(3²+4²)=5
I didn't understand Row's solution, but maybe a little plot from Mathematica will help the OP:
Plot[{Sin[2 Pi t/3] + 2.5, Sin[2 Pi t/4] + 2.5,
Sin[2 Pi t/3] + Sin[2 Pi t/4]}, {t, 0, 20}, PlotRange -> {-2.5, 5}]
Attachments
AddSines.bmp
6.3 KB
· Views: 486
#5
row
9
0
yep that was a silly thing i guess, so time period cannot be added as vectors
but when you look at the graph,doesnt it seem as 12.
so can we argue that they are the LCM??
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it.
I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction.
I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook.
Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water.
I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...