Ball and socket contact stresses

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on modeling ball and socket contact stresses using Hertzian contact mechanics. A formula for maximum compressive stress is provided, incorporating parameters such as compressive load, diameters of the socket and ball, and material properties like modulus of elasticity and Poisson's ratio. It emphasizes that maximum Hertzian stresses do not occur at the surface of the bodies involved. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding these factors for accurate modeling. Overall, the thread serves as a resource for those seeking to apply Hertzian mechanics to ball and socket configurations.
cabellos6
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I am familiar with Hertzian contact mechanics for spheres in contact with a falt surface or a sphere in contact with another sphere. However, I am unsure on how to model a ball and socket contact? Could anyone help me with this idea please?

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Sorry it took so long on this. I apparently forgot how to read.

According to the bible, Roark's, for a ball and socket:

The max compressive stress is:

\sigma_c = .918\left[ \sqrt[3]{\frac{P}{K_D^2 C_E^2}}\right]

Where:
P=the compressive load applied
K_D= Load condition factor = \frac{D_1D_2}{D_1-D_2}
D_1= Diameter of the socket
D_2= Diameter of the ball
C_E= \left[\frac{1-\nu_1^2}{E_1}\right]+\left[\frac{1-\nu_2^2}{E_2}\right]
E, \nu = Modulus of elasticity and Poisson's Ratio

Also, don't forget that the maximums for Hertzian stresses do not occur at the surface of the bodies.
 
Last edited:
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top