Is a Zero Principal Minor in PSD Matrices Indicative of Smaller Zero Minors?

NaturePaper
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,
Let A=(a_{ij}) be a symmetric (i.e., over reals) PSD matrix. Then is the following correct?

"If any principle minor ( \ne A ) be zero, then all principle minor contained in this minor should also be zero".

I can not prove or disprove it..any help?

By the way how the result will change if we consider Hermitian matrix (over complex) instead of symmetric matrix?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh..I got the answer. Its not correct. Consider the diagonal matrix: D={1,1,0,1,...}. Clearly $A_33=0$ but $A_22$ is non-zero.
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Back
Top