What Is the Net Force on the -2 mC Charge in a Triangular Charge Configuration?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the net force on a -2 mC charge within a triangular configuration of three fixed charges. The initial calculations included incorrect angle assumptions, particularly regarding the angle at point 3, which was mistakenly identified as 32.5 degrees. A suggestion was made to accurately determine the angle using the arctangent function based on the coordinates of the charges. Additionally, it was pointed out that the angles between different charge pairs are not necessarily the same, which could lead to further errors in calculations. Accurate drawing and analysis of the charge configuration are recommended for clarity and correctness.
yjk91
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a region of two-dimensional space, there are three fixed charges: +1 mC at (0, 0), −2 mC at (15 mm, -2 mm), and +3 mC at (-5 mm, 15 mm). What is the net force on the −2-mC charge?


? magnitude
? direction ° counter-clockwise from the +x-axis



The Attempt at a Solution


3mc = point 1
1 mc = point 2
-2 mc = point 3

length (1-3) = 26.25 mm
length (2-3) = 15.133 mm
length(1-2) = 15.811 mm

angle at point 3 is 32.5 degree using the sss triangle formula

F(1to3) = k *q1* q3 / l^2
Fx13 = F(1to3) Cos(32.5)
Fy13 = F(1to3) sin(32.5)

F(2 to 3) = k *q2* q3 / l^2
Fx23 = F(2to3) Cos(32.5)
Fy23 = F(2to3) sin(32.5)

Fx13 + Fx23 = Fxnet
Fy13 + Fy23 = Fynet

rad (Fxnet ^2 + Fynet^2 ) = Fnet which is the magnitude but it seems like I'm off by few points the answer has to be pretty close since i have to plug it into the system. Does anyone know where i made the mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yjk91 said:
angle at point 3 is 32.5 degree using the sss triangle formula

It's not 32.5 degrees. Point 3 is at (15,-2), which means it's at an angle of atan(-2/15). Try drawing out the three points to get a better feel for the configuration.

F(2 to 3) = k *q2* q3 / l^2
Fx23 = F(2to3) Cos(32.5)
Fy23 = F(2to3) sin(32.5)

You seem to be assuming that the angle from 2 to 3 is the same as the angle from 1 to 3, but there's no reason for this to be the case.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top