Calculating Electric Field & Proton Acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field and proton acceleration due to a charged wire. The user attempts to find the electric field at a specific distance from the wire using the formula E = K*q/r² but finds their result differs from the expected answer. Suggestions include using charge density to express dq and adjusting the integral to account for the geometry of the problem. Additionally, the importance of considering the vertical components of the electric field vectors is emphasized, along with the recommendation to create a diagram for clarity. The conversation highlights the need for detailed calculations and proper setup in physics problems.
yjk91
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A total of 3.22 106 electrons are placed on an initially uncharged wire of length 1.29 m.

(a) What is the magnitude of the electric field a perpendicular distance of 0.396 m away from the midpoint of the wire?


(b) What is the magnitude of the acceleration of a proton placed at that point in space?


The Attempt at a Solution



A total of 2.82 * 10^6 electrons are placed on an initially uncharged wire of length 1.34 m.
(a) What is the magnitude of the electric field a perpendicular distance of 0.404 m away from the midpoint of the wire?

so i did
2.82 X 10^6 electrons X 1.6 X 10^-19 C = 4.512 * 10 ^-13 = q

then i used E = K*q / r^2

E = 2 integral( k*q / r^2, min .404, max .78 (the hypot))
and got 0.00969 but the answer is 0.0128 n/C

mmm a little offf any suggestions?


(b) What is the magnitude of the acceleration of a proton placed at that point in space?
Newtons famous law Force = mass*accel
Look up the mass of a proton
a = F/m
does this look right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Your part (a) is missing a lot of detail; I can't tell if it is right without doing all the work! In Integral k*dq/r², what did you replace dq with? Say you use λ = q/1.34 as the charge density along the wire. Then dq = λ*dx would work. But your integral is now over x, so r² has to be expressed in terms of x. Also, the horizontal components of the dE vectors cancel out, so you must put in a cosine or sine to take only the vertical component. I think a diagram is required to make sense of what is vertical and what is horizontal. Did you do all that?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top