Distribution of charge in two charged capacitors joined in a circuit

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of two charged capacitors when connected in a circuit, specifically focusing on the final voltage across each capacitor and the energy changes during charge redistribution. The scope includes conceptual understanding and technical reasoning related to capacitors in parallel and energy loss in circuits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the final voltage across both capacitors must be the same because they are connected in parallel, though there is uncertainty about how this configuration leads to equal voltage.
  • Others argue that energy is lost during the redistribution of charge due to resistance in the circuit, including the wires and internal resistance of the capacitors, though the exact mechanisms and implications are debated.
  • A participant mentions that energy loss occurs through heating in the wires and electromagnetic radiation due to changing currents during the charging and discharging processes.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of assuming no circuit resistance, with one participant noting that if resistance is ignored, it leads to unphysical results, such as infinite equalization current.
  • Some participants express confusion about the energy calculations, questioning why the total energy stored after connection is less than the sum of the individual energies stored before connection.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the final voltage across the capacitors will be the same due to their parallel connection. However, there is disagreement and uncertainty regarding the reasons for energy loss and the implications of resistance in the circuit.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about ideal components versus real-world conditions, the role of resistance, and the implications of energy loss during charge redistribution. The discussion does not resolve these complexities.

thisischris
Messages
26
Reaction score
1
Hello!

I'm having a bit of a struggle understanding the logic behind these two questions.

A 2.2 uF capacitor is charged to a potential of 15V, and a 3.3uF capacitor is charged to a potential of 30V.
The capacitors are then joined together as in the circuit diagram. When the switch s is closed, the charge re-distributes between the capacitors. Explain why the final voltage across each capacitor is the same.

Answer: Capacitors are in parallel.

I sort of agree that the voltage would be the same otherwise charge would 'flow' from one point to another. I don't understand how them being in parallel explains this however.

Suggest why the calculated value of energy stored by the capacitors (1.6 x10-3J) is less than the total energy that would be stored by the capacitors individually.

Answer: Work is done redistributing charge.

Is this due to resistance/internal resistance(?). However we haven't accounted for it (I think?) so I don't see why it should be lower, unless the question refers to a actual experiment that may take place?


Thank you :smile:
 

Attachments

  • stat0istics.png
    stat0istics.png
    13.2 KB · Views: 627
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
After connecting both capacitors, you have a voltage between the lower and the upper wire (where I do not care about its value here). Both capacitors are connected to them (in parallel), therefore they both have this voltage.
Is this due to resistance/internal resistance(?)
It is. With ideal components, you get unphysical results. However, in reality you usually have some resistance somewhere (wires, switch, capacitors). If you carefully avoid all of them, the small inductance of the system can give you a resonator and it takes a while to reach equilibrium.[/size] Anyway, you can calculate the equilibrium voltage and the corresponding energy, and you know that some energy has to leave the system in order to reach this state.
 
When capacitors are charged or discharged energy is lost in the process. Energy is lost in the connecting wires and any resistance in the circuit. Energy lost in the wires can be heating due to the resistance of the wires and electro magnetic radiation from the wires due to the changing current during charging/discharging.
 
Chris,

I sort of agree that the voltage would be the same otherwise charge would 'flow' from one point to another. I don't understand how them being in parallel explains this however.

When they are in parallel, both ends of the two capacitors are connected to the same two points. Therefore, they have to be at the same voltage. That is not true for series connected caps.

Is this due to resistance/internal resistance(?). However we haven't accounted for it (I think?) so I don't see why it should be lower, unless the question refers to a actual experiment that may take place?

If you assume no circuit resistance, then no energy will be lost. But then you also have to assume the the equalization current will be infinite. That can never happen in a practical circuit, so the final energy will always be less the initial value.

Ratch
 
Thank you for everyone's help. Much appreciated. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
15K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K