Angular Momentum of an object with respect to a moving point

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angular momentum of particle B with respect to particle A about a fixed point O. Two approaches are presented: the first involves calculating the angular momentum of both particles relative to O and then finding their vector difference, while the second approach considers the relative motion of B with respect to A. The first approach is shown to be flawed because it can lead to incorrect conclusions, as demonstrated by a counterexample where both particles have the same angular momentum about O. The correct method involves using the relative position and velocity of B with respect to A to accurately compute angular momentum. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that angular momentum cannot be treated like position vectors when determining relative motion.
Tanya Sharma
Messages
1,541
Reaction score
135

Homework Statement



Two particles A and B having equal masses m are rotating around a fixed point O with constant angular speed ω .A is connected to point O with a string of length L/2 whereas B is connected to point A with string of length L/2 .Find the angular momentum of B with respect to A about O.

O-------L/2-------A-------L/2--------B

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



There can be two approaches

1.We find angular momentum of B w.r.t O ,say L1 = mω2L.Then we find angular momentum of A w.r.t O ,say L2 = (mω2L)/4.Since angular momentum is a vector , angular momentum of B w.r.t A should be vector difference of L1 and L2 =(3/4)(mω2L)

2.We find relative velocity of B w.r.t A =ωL/2 ,i.e we have considered particle A to be at rest .Then we find shortest distance between point A and line of motion of B which is L/2 .
Now,angular momentum of A w.r.t B =(mω2L)/4

I feel approach 1 is the correct way of calculating angular momentum of a point with respect to a moving point ,but the correct answer is the one given by approach 2.

Which is the right way ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello.

To see that method 1 doesn’t work, consider the case where the equal masses A and B are at the ends and the axis O is in the middle: A----------O----------B. The system revolves about O. Then A and B would have the same angular momentum vector about O. So, if you tried to get the angular momentum of B relative to A by subtracting the angular momenta of A and B about O, you would get zero. But that can’t be correct as B is moving relative to A.

For a general situation, you can see more formally why it doesn’t work by noting that ##\vec{L}_{A/O} =m_A \vec{r}_{A/O} \times\vec{v}_{A/O}##. Similarly for particle B. If you subtract them, you can see that it's not possible in general to reduce it to ##\vec{L}_{B/A} =m_B \vec{r}_{B/A} \times\vec{v}_{B/A}##

The reason you can subtract two velocity vectors to get a relative velocity is because of the relation between the position vectors: ##\vec{r}_{B/A} = \vec{r}_{B/O} - \vec{r}_{A/O}## which holds at each instant of time. Taking the time derivative gives the relative velocity formula.
 
Hello TSny

Thank you very much for the explanation :smile:

So , I guess my misconception stemmed from the fact that I was treating Angular Momentum which is a vector in the same manner as we treat position vectors .ie \vec{L}_{A/B} =\vec{L}_{A/O}+\vec{L}_{B/O} ,which is not the correct way. Instead I should have dealt Angular Momentum of A w.r.t as \vec{L}_{B/A} =m_B \vec{r}_{B/A} \times\vec{v}_{B/A} .

Am I correct in assessing my mistake ?
 
Yes, I think that's right. There's no reason why angular momentum vectors would be related the same as position vectors.
 
TSny...thanks once again
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top