When is electric field zero and electric potential non zero

AI Thread Summary
Electric potential is a scalar quantity, while electric field strength is a vector quantity. The incorrect statement in the discussion is that electric potential is zero whenever electric field strength is zero. An example provided illustrates that at the midpoint between two positive charges, the electric field can be zero while the electric potential remains non-zero. This is confirmed by the relationship that electric potential decreases with distance, allowing for a constant potential even when the electric field is absent. The reasoning presented is valid, highlighting the distinction between electric field and potential.
mrcotton
Messages
120
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Which one of the following statements about electric field strength and electric potential is
incorrect?
A Electric potential is a scalar quantity.
B Electric field strength is a vector quantity.
C Electric potential is zero whenever the electric field strength is zero.
D The potential gradient is proportional to the electric field strength.

Homework Equations



E=K Q/(R^2)
V=K Q/R

K=1/(4∏ε)

The Attempt at a Solution



The answer is C

If for example you had two positive charges of 3 coulombs a distance 4m apart.
The electrostatic field at the midpoint would be zero. Effectively a positive charge at this point would be push by an equal force in both directions.

However the Electric potential V would be 2*(k*(3/4)

So you can have a zero E with a non zero V

Is this logic ok
Thanks for any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mrcotton said:


However the Electric potential V would be 2*(k*(3/4)

So you can have a zero E with a non zero V

Is this logic ok
Thanks for any help

The electrical potential goes as 1/r, but your reasoning is correct. You could also consider the electric potential and electric fields associated with spherical conductors: Provided the conductor is closed, the E field inside is 0 but the potential is a constant.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top